22 fatalities

Navigational Error Leads to Crash of Aircraft Near Léoncel (F-GGDM)

Léoncel, FranceFlight

On April 10, 1989, a Fairchild-Hiller FH-227 (registration F-GGDM) operated by Uni Air International was involved in an aviation accident near Léoncel, France in flight. 22 people were killed. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The accident is the direct result of a navigational error. This error had the direct causes: - The display and use the VOR LSA (Lyon-Satolas) instead of VNE (Vienne), - An insufficiency in the mental representation of the path of the aircraft despite other… This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A).

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 2026-06-11Data APIEditorial standards

Aircraft strikes cliff near Léoncel after navigational error; all 22 occupants killed. Inquiry cites wrong VOR use and crew coordination issues.

Incident Overview

On a flight from Paris-Orly, the crew received clearances to descend to FL070 at 2049 local time and then to FL060 at 2055. An instruction to turn right to 178° toward the VOR of Vienne was given, but after passing VNE VOR, the aircraft followed a wrong track of 155°. At 2058, the crew was transferred from Lyon-Satolas Approach to Valence Approach, with radio contact established 30 seconds later. The crew was cleared to descend to 3,500 feet for a specified arrival route Vienne–Valence. A right turn to 200° was initiated when, at a speed of 187 knots, the aircraft struck the vertical cliff of 'Pierre Chauve' (1,260 meters high) near Léoncel. The aircraft disintegrated on impact, and all 22 occupants were killed.

Investigation Findings

The official investigation determined that the accident was the direct result of a navigational error. This error had two direct causes: the display and use of the VOR LSA (Lyon-Satolas) instead of VNE (Vienne), and an insufficiency in the mental representation of the aircraft's path despite other available information. Contributing factors included a lack of rigor in the division of work, in its execution, and in mutual control. The investigation also noted that several circumstances facilitated the development of a critical situation: the documentation used by the crew for navigation and the organization of the dashboard could be sources of error; the organization of airspace in the Valence region did not allow optimal use of existing radar; the tasks of the crew were not defined by the operator; and the copilot had a moderate but significant blood alcohol level.

Probable cause

The accident is the direct result of a navigational error. This error had the direct causes: - The display and use the VOR LSA (Lyon-Satolas) instead of VNE (Vienne), - An insufficiency in the mental representation of the path of the aircraft despite other available information. Moreover, the lack of rigor in the division of work in their execution and in the mutual control are contributing factors. The Committee also noted that the following facts have facilitated the development of a critical situation: - Documentation of the crew used for navigation and organization of the dashboard of the plane could be sources of error, - The organization of the airspace in the region of Valence did not allow optimal use of existing radar, - The tasks of the crew were not defined by the operator, - The copilot had a moderate but significant blood alcohol level.