GA SMA ACCEPTED AN IFR CLRNC WITH A FREQ ASSIGNMENT KNOWING HE DID NOT HAVE THE FREQ ON HIS COM RADIO. SAYS HE THOUGHT IF HE GOT CLOSE IT WOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH.
Synopsis
GA SMA ACCEPTED AN IFR CLRNC WITH A FREQ ASSIGNMENT KNOWING HE DID NOT HAVE THE FREQ ON HIS COM RADIO. SAYS HE THOUGHT IF HE GOT CLOSE IT WOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH.
Narrative
BECAUSE IT WAS LATE AT NIGHT; SPI TWR WAS CLOSED AND SO WAS THEIR APCH CTL. I FILED MY FLT PLAN (IFR) WITH ST LOUIS FSS OVER THE PHONE AND I COPIED MY CLRNC FROM THEM OVER THE RADIO PRIOR TO TKOF. I WAS INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT KANSAS CITY ARTCC ON 127.27 AFTER TKOF. I TOOK OFF ON RWY 22 AND TURNED N TO CLB OUT. I HAD BEEN CLRED TO 5000 FT. MY RADIO WAS NOT CAPABLE OF A .27 FREQ; BUT FROM PRIOR EXPERIENCE AND INSTRUCTION; THE AGENCY COULD BE CONTACTED ON A .25 OR .50 FREQ. I TRIED BOTH; BUT NO CONTACT. I FIGURED THAT I WOULD HAVE A BETTER CHANCE OF REACHING THEM AT A HIGHER ALT. I WAS CALLING THEM ON CLBOUT; BUT NO CONTACT. I FINALLY CALLED ST LOUIS FSS AND INFORMED THEM OF THE PROBLEM. I WAS GIVEN A DIFFERENT FREQ. I TOLD FSS ABOUT MY RADIO'S INABILITY TO DIAL IN THE FREQ ASSIGNED BUT THAT I HAD HOPED TO REACH THEM ON THE OTHER FREQS. FSS SAID THAT I SHOULD HAVE NOTIFIED THEM OF MY INABILITY TO DIAL IN THE ASSIGNED ALT FREQ. SINCE IT'S A COMMON PRACTICE TO DIAL IN THE CLOSEST FREQ; I SUGGEST THAT YOU PUT THE WORD OUT TO THE EFFECT THIS PRACTICE IS WRONG. IF A PLT CANNOT DIAL IN THE EXACT FREQ THAT HE IS GIVEN; HE IS APPARENTLY SUPPOSED TO SAY SO.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.