Beech 55 pilot reported descending below the glideslope on an ILS approach when the autopilot apparently malfunctioned.
Synopsis
Beech 55 pilot reported descending below the glideslope on an ILS approach when the autopilot apparently malfunctioned.
Narrative
After being vectored to the ILS at ZZZ; I established on the localizer using the STEC 60 autopilot. Once picking up the glideslope; the autopilot started a steep descent ending up well below the glide path. I pulled back on the yoke to lessen the dive; but it continued its downward trend. Before I was able to disconnect it; I had ventured about 900 feet below the glideslope. I disengaged the autopilot and looked up through the windscreen and could visually see the runway approximately 6 to 7 miles ahead. With nothing between me and the runway; I climbed back to the glide path and tried to re-engage the autopilot to try to troubleshoot the problem. It immediately started another descent below the glideslope.At that point ATC called to remind me that I was below the glideslope and the altitude in that area was 1;400 feet MSL. I immediately disengaged the autopilot for the second time and hand flew the aircraft back to the glideslope and made a successful landing. After exiting the active I was informed to contact the Tower Supervisor which was done immediately after exiting the aircraft on the ramp. I informed the Tower Supervisor that I didn't believe that there were any problems with the airport equipment; that my autopilot had malfunctioned; but I was visually in sight of the runway during the event. I will have the autopilot checked by a certified avionics shop prior to using it again.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.