A319 Captain reported refusing the aircraft due to multiple occurrences of ELAC failures.

Date: 2022-03 · Aircraft: A319 · Phase: ground

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-critical|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-maintenance|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-mel-cdl

Synopsis

A319 Captain reported refusing the aircraft due to multiple occurrences of ELAC failures.

Narrative

I was Captain on Date 3. On day 3; Date 4; we were assigned to fly Aircraft X; an Airbus 319; from ZZZ to ZZZ1. When we arrived at the aircraft; the Line Mechanic was going through the logbook and made a comment; paraphrasing; You might want to take a good look at the logbook." So that is what we did.Date; Logbook Deferral Sheet (List) XXXXXXXX. Eng 2 FADEC A Fault; FADEC B Fault. Action taken: Replaced #2; something I can't read; engine run. OPS Check good.Date 1; Logbook Deferral Sheet (List) YYYYYYY. F/CTL ELAC 2 Pitch; fault light extinguished. Action taken: Replaced ELAC #1 and ELAC #2. Performed Satisfactory Land CAT II Test.Date 1; Logbook Deferral Sheet (List) ZZZZZZZ. ENG 2 FADEC A Fault FADEC B Fault. Sound familiar [?] Action taken: Removed; cleaned and reinstalled ID plug. Fault cleared. Ran ENG OPS CK - good.Date 2; Logbook Deferral Sheet (List) AAAAAAA. FLT Control ELAC 2 Fault; procedure reset unsuccessful. Action taken: Performed reset; OPS Check good.Date 3; Logbook Deferral Sheet (List) BBBBBBB. FLT Control ELAC 2 Fault. Action taken: R & R THSA Position Actuator Functional Test THSA; Leak and OPS CK good.Date 4; Logbook Deferral Sheet (List) CCCCCCC. Reference Logbook Deferral Sheet (List) AAAAAAA; post-flight report showed STAB Trim Actuator 9CE Position Error of ELAC 2. Action taken: R & R THSA Position Actuator; Functional Test THSA Leak and OPS CK good. Request Maintenance Discrepancy 005-EEE be applied.Date 4; my write-up. Logbook Deferral Sheet (List) FFFFFFF. Refusing aircraft due to multiple write-ups for the same items - ELAC; stab trim. Should have included as Electronic Engine Control well.So YES; I declined the aircraft due to airworthy issues. I included the thoughts and views from the First Officer; Name; as well as the Line Mechanic. Soon thereafter I received a phone call from the Chief Pilot on duty. He asked what was going on and I informed him of my concerns and reiterated I was declining the aircraft. Not long after that I received a text from the Chief Pilot on duty which said the following: "CA (Captain) - I looked at your logbook online and there has certainly been some recent work on [the] flight controls. The Maintenance Manager here would be glad to speak with you to help inform your decision. Please let me know if you need anything else." I received another phone call offering to put the Maintenance Manager on the call; I declined that conversation as the FO (First Officer) and I were in complete concurrence. Comment: Just a bit of pilot pushing there I'd say.Eventually we got another aircraft and we left ZZZ for ZZZ1 about 4 ½ hours late. Being curious; I followed up on what happened with Aircraft X. The flight did depart with another crew to ZZZ2 on Date 4. The crew arrived in ZZZ at XA:46; the scheduled departure to ZZZ2 was XB:14; [and] they blocked OUT at XC:08. Still being curious; I looked in [the] electronic records and guess what I saw.Logbook Deferral Sheet (List) GGGGGGG. F/CTL ELAC 2 Pitch Fault. Aircraft X noted Out of Service.Suggestion - completing a flight check."

NASA callback

Reporter stated they did not have any information on what caused the ELAC failures. Reporter added they felt pressured to accept the aircraft. The company eventually found another crew to fly the aircraft and they experienced similar failures. The aircraft was then written up again and taken out of service.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.