EMB-190 Captain reported EICAS Messages for HYD 1/2 LO PRESS and HYD 1/2 ELEC PUMP FAIL on final approach. The flight crew quickly ran the QRH and continued to land. The aircraft required a tow to the gate.

Date: 2022-07 · Aircraft: EMB ERJ 190/195 ER/LR · Phase: approach

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-critical|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance|ground-event-encounter-loss-of-aircraft-control

Synopsis

EMB-190 Captain reported EICAS Messages for HYD 1/2 LO PRESS and HYD 1/2 ELEC PUMP FAIL on final approach. The flight crew quickly ran the QRH and continued to land. The aircraft required a tow to the gate.

Narrative

Aircraft XZZZZ to ZZZZ1We were on the arrival to Runway XX; Approach Control started to slow us for in trail spacing for the runway. We were being slowed drastically because of spacing so I chose to configure the aircraft early for landing. The aircraft was fully configured gear down Flaps 5 well outside the FAF and roughly around 2;500 feet AGL. After passing the FAF ZZZZZ; and inside roughly 1;700 feet; we got the EICAS (Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System) messages for HYD 1/2 LO PRESS and HYD 1/2 ELEC PUMP FAIL. It was also noted that the PTU (Power Transfer Unit) turned on and the messages cleared themselves momentarily. Seconds later we received HYD 2 LO QTY; I was in control of the aircraft as PF (Pilot Flying) and instructed the First Officer (Pilot Monitoring) to pull up his HYD page on the MFD (Multi-function Flight Display); we noticed the quantity was showing ZERO. We were able to quickly diagnose the situation and I called for the QRH; the First Officer did good work beginning to run the procedure; we got through the procedure; and was lead to the loss of HYD System 2 QRH where we briefed the special landing considerations. After being satisfied knowing that we could safely land; it was at this point we concluded our Non Normal procedures. It was my determination and agreeable of the FO (First Officer) that the safest course of action would be to land. At this point we were fully configured for landing and it was decided that was the best scenario to be in; and not to change any configuration. This was the best situation to be in as we were coming up on short final. Runway XX at ZZZZ1 is over 10;000 feet long and we needed roughly 3;900 feet. Even with the landing distance addition for the failure it would be multiplied by 1.66 resulting in needing roughly 7;000 feet; plenty of runway remained and was available.Using my best judgement; we decided the safest course of action due to being fully configured already for landing and on roughly a 4 - 5 mile final was to continue the landing at ZZZZ1 especially with a 10;000 foot runway. We landed NORMALLY; and it was during the roll out; we received the associated flight control failure messages that would be expected with a loss of HYD SYS 2.I was unable to use nose wheel steering; and had reduced braking; however I was able to vacate Runway XX via the high speed taxiway and came to a stop on Taxiway 1; short of runways where we then coordinated with OPS; Ground and Tower to get a tow to the handstand parking.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.