TRACON'S XMITTER FAILED. ACFT BEING VECTORED FOR A RWY 9L VISUAL FLEW THROUGH FINAL APCH COURSE AND CONFLICTED WITH ANOTHER ACFT ON FINAL FOR RWY 9R.

Date: 1991-11 · Aircraft: Light Transport; Low Wing; 2 Turboprop Eng · Phase: approach

Anomalies: conflict-airborne-conflict|other-unspecified

Synopsis

TRACON'S XMITTER FAILED. ACFT BEING VECTORED FOR A RWY 9L VISUAL FLEW THROUGH FINAL APCH COURSE AND CONFLICTED WITH ANOTHER ACFT ON FINAL FOR RWY 9R.

Narrative

INBOUND TO MIA FROM APF ON SCHEDULED COMMUTER FLT. WE WERE 3000 FT MSL ON RADAR VECTOR FOR VISUAL APCH TO 9L AT MIA. AFTER SEVERAL HDG CHANGES AND A CLB TO 4000 FT FOR RESEQUENCING ON FINAL W OF MIA; WERE IN A TURN FROM N TO S WHEN HANDED OFF TO 124.75 (A DIFFERENT APCH FREQ). THE OTHER CTLR DID NOT ANSWER MYSELF OR 2 OTHER ACFT THAT WERE TRYING TO CHK IN WITH HIM. I IMMEDIATELY SWITCHED BACK TO FIRST CTLR AND MONITORED SECOND CTLR (124.75) ON #2 COM RADIO. WHILE THIS RADIO CONFUSION WAS OCCURRING; WE CONTINUED OUR LAST ASSIGNED ATC INSTRUCTIONS. IN DOING SO; WE FLEW THROUGH THE APCH PATH OF BOTH PARALLEL (9L AND 9R) RWYS AND PASSED DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF AN ACFT ON FINAL AT OUR ALT. WE ENSURED SAFE SEPARATION AS I REGAINED CONTACT WITH 124.75 MHZ CTLR. APPARENTLY; HIS XMITTER WAS OFF THE AIR FOR ABOUT 1 MIN. THERE WAS NO MISHAP; BUT THE POSSIBILITY FOR A MIDAIR WAS GREAT IN THESE VMC CONDITIONS. I BELIEVE THERE WAS AN EQUIP PROBLEM WITH ATC AS WELL AS A HDOF MADE AT A CRITICAL TIME THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN AVOIDED. CONFUSION RESULTED; TO SAY THE LEAST. WE LANDED SAFELY ON 9L.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.