ACR FLC CLBED MLG ABOVE OPTIMUM CEILING. COULD NOT MAINTAIN ALT.

Date: 1991-11 · Aircraft: Medium Large Transport; Low Wing; 2 Turbojet Eng

Anomalies: deviation-altitude-excursion-from-assigned-altitude|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy

Synopsis

ACR FLC CLBED MLG ABOVE OPTIMUM CEILING. COULD NOT MAINTAIN ALT.

Narrative

ENRTE FROM SMF TO LAX AN MLG WAS CLRED TO CLB TO FL370. AS FL350 CAME AND WENT; IT BECAME EVIDENT THAT THE ACFT WAS NEARING ITS CEILING SO BOTH THE CAPT AND I LOOKED AT THE PERFORMANCE NUMBERS WHICH STATED THE OPTIMUM CEILING WAS FL360 AND MAX CEILING FL370. SO WE CONTINUED CLB TO FL370 WITHOUT INCIDENT. AFTER LEVEL OFF; THE AUTOPLT WAS PLACED ON AND SHORTLY THEREAFTER THE CLRNC TO A NEW HDG 30 DEGS TO R WAS GIVEN. WITH A BANK ANGLE OF 15 DEGS SELECTED THE AUTOPLT BEGAN THE TURN. BOTH PLTS OBSERVED THIS THEN SET ABOUT OUR OTHER DUTIES. A FEW SECONDS LATER BOTH PLTS LOOKED UP TO OBSERVE THE ALT SLOWLY DSNDING THROUGH FL36.8. AT THAT POINT I DISCONNECTED AUTOPLT AND TRIED TO REGAIN THE ALT TO NO AVAIL. THE ACFT CONTINUED TO SINK ON THE EDGE OF A STALL BUFFET; UNABLE TO HOLD ALT. AFTER FIRST BEING DENIED A LOWER ALT; THE CAPT AGAIN STATED THAT WE WERE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN FL370 AND A CLRNC TO FL330 WAS RECEIVED. WE BELIEVE THAT EITHER THE ACFT WAS HEAVIER THAN INDICATED (I.E.; HEAVIER CARGO) AND OUR NUMBERS WERE INCORRECT. NEXT TIME WE WILL BOTH BE MORE AWARE OF THE ACFT'S WARNING SIGNS.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.