Flight crew flying a CE-680 aircraft reported an EGPWS alert on approach.
Synopsis
Flight crew flying a CE-680 aircraft reported an EGPWS alert on approach.
Narrative
I was pilot flying as Second In Command (SIC) from the right seat. We were landing at ZZZ during day VFR conditions. We had previously briefed the visual approach procedures and related safety alerts regarding arrivals to ZZZ Runway XX. We set up and briefed the arrival per the guidance in Jeppesen Plate. I had reviewed the FOQA alert as well. Approach Control kept us at 6;000 ft. due to other traffic until just west of ZZZ; while still on with Approach Control we received and complied with an RA climb. Soon after clearing the RA traffic we were cleared for the visual approach to Runway XX. We proceeded to the right base fix in the FMS; I engaged VNAV. Due to our proximity to the airport and our altitude the vertical path was excessive. Due to the descent rate we received a EGPWS warning; we climbed; executed a missed approach and notified ATC. We were vectored onto the right downwind; we rearmed the FMS programming and completed the arrival and landing in a stabilized manner. Due to my focus on the visual procedure and due to the abnormal ATC attitude constraints as well as the last minute RA climb I lost basic situational awareness of our altitude. As soon as the aircraft began its steep descent I should have executed a missed approach.
Second reporter narrative
Approximately 10 NM west of ZZZ; we were level at 6;000 ft. on a vector to join the right downwind for Runway XX. In that area the floor of ZZZ1's Class B is 6;000 ft. I noted a target on TCAS at 5;500 ft. and climbing toward us; opposite direction. Very shortly thereafter we received a CLIMB RA; we climbed to 6;600 ft. before the other aircraft passed behind us. In an attempt to return to the proper vertical profile for the visual approach XX; we descended too rapidly; which resulted in an EGPWS TERRAIN warning. We executed a go-around and returned for a normal approach and landing.The CLIMB RA put us significantly off our vertical profile in close proximity to ZZZ. Instead of attempting to return to profile in the confines of the traffic pattern; a better option would have been to request a 360 or vectors to give us the time to regroup and set up properly for the approach. I will say that we did thoroughly brief the procedure prior to departing ZZZ2 and reviewed it en-route.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.