ACFT EQUIP PROBLEM AND RESULTING ATTEMPTS AT CHKLIST USE REVEALS PUBLICATION DEFICIENCY.
Synopsis
ACFT EQUIP PROBLEM AND RESULTING ATTEMPTS AT CHKLIST USE REVEALS PUBLICATION DEFICIENCY.
Narrative
SHORTLY AFTER TKOF FROM ACY; THE R HYD PRESSURE ANNUNCIATOR BEGAN TO FLICKER. AFTER A MIN OR SO THE R HYD PRESSURE ANNUNCIATOR ILLUMINATED STEADILY; INDICATING A LOSS OF PRESSURE AT THE R HYD PUMP. AT THIS TIME I REQUESTED THAT THE FO CHK THE HYD PRESSURE GAUGE. THE SYS PRESSURE INDICATED NORMAL. APPROX 1 MIN LATER THE L HYD PRESSURE ANNUNCIATOR ILLUMINATED AND THE SYS PRESSURE DROPPED TO 0. AT THIS TIME I; AS PNF; INFORMED ATC OF OUR PROBLEM AND REQUESTED TO RETURN TO ACY AND LAND. EMER EQUIP WAS REQUESTED AS A PRECAUTION. AFTER THE ACFT HAD BEEN TURNED BACK TOWARD THE ARPT; WE CONSULTED THE EMER CHKLIST ONLY TO FIND THAT IT CONTAINED NO PROC FOR A HYD SYS FAILURE. IT SHOULD BE POINTED OUT HERE THAT THE HYD PRESSURE ANNUNCIATORS ARE RED; INDICATING AN EMER SITUATION. THE SYS WAS SECURED AND A MANUAL EXTENSION OF THE LNDG GEAR WAS ACCOMPLISHED FROM MEMORY. LNDG AT ACY WAS UNEVENTFUL. THE PROBLEM WAS DISCOVERED TO BE A BROKEN HYD LINE THAT HAD ALLOWED ALL OF THE HYD FLUID TO BE PUMPED OVERBOARD. I HAD FLOWN THIS PARTICULAR TYPE OF ACFT; AN LTT; FOR ANOTHER COMPANY PRIOR TO COMING TO MY PRESENT COMPANY 3 MONTHS AGO. BOTH COMPANIES HAVE APPROVED PROCS AND CHKLISTS; BUT THEY ARE VERY DIFFERENT. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT; FOR A GIVEN ACFT TYPE; THERE SHOULD BE ONLY ONE SET OF CORRECT PROCS. WHEN I CONSULTED THE EMER CHKLIST ON THIS OCCASION; I EXPECTED TO FIND A HYD FAILURE PROC BECAUSE MY FORMER AIRLINE HAD ONE. THE NEED FOR STANDARDIZATION IS WELL RECOGNIZED IN THE AVIATION SAFETY COMMUNITY. IT DOES NOT; HOWEVER; SEEM TO EXTEND VERY FAR AFIELD. THE OBVIOUS SOLUTION TO A PROBLEM SUCH AS DESCRIBED ABOVE IS TO REQUIRE; AS A PART OF CERTIFICATION; A SET OF CHKLISTS THAT WOULD BE USED BY ALL OPERATORS WITHOUT MODIFICATION. MY COMPANY HAS ONLY BEEN OPERATING LTT'S FOR 5 MONTHS. I DO NOT FEEL THAT THEY ARE QUALIFIED TO DEVELOP CHKLISTS FOR AN ACFT WITH WHICH THEY HAVE LITTLE EXPERIENCE. ALSO; FAA DESIGNATED POI FOR THIS AIRLINE HAS NO LTT EXPERIENCE. HE REVIEWED AND APPROVED THE CHKLIST I ATTEMPTED TO USE. IT SHOULD BE LEFT TO THE PEOPLE WHO KNOW THE AIRPLANE; THE MANUFACTURERS; TO DEVELOP THE CHKLISTS THAT WILL BE USED IN ITS OP.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.