ACR FLC OPERATED MALFUNCTIONED APU ACFT EQUIP EVEN THOUGH THE APU HAD BEEN WRITTEN-UP IN THE ACFT RECORDS AS OTS DUE TO CAUSING SMOKE IN THE PAX CABIN.

Date: 1992-03 · Aircraft: Medium Large Transport; Low Wing; 2 Turbojet Eng

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-critical|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-other-unknown|other-unspecified

Synopsis

ACR FLC OPERATED MALFUNCTIONED APU ACFT EQUIP EVEN THOUGH THE APU HAD BEEN WRITTEN-UP IN THE ACFT RECORDS AS OTS DUE TO CAUSING SMOKE IN THE PAX CABIN.

Narrative

THE ACFT WE WERE USING TODAY HAD AN MEL ON THE APU FOR ITS HAVING PREVIOUSLY PUMPED SMOKE INTO THE CABIN. ALTHOUGH THE LOGBOOK WRITE-UP THAT PROMPTED ITS BEING TAKEN OTS DID NOT SAY SO SPECIFICALLY; THE CAPT ASSUMED THAT THE ACTUAL PROBLEM WAS ONE WHEREIN THE SMOKE HAD BEEN CREATED ONLY WHEN USING THE APU AIR SOURCE FOR AIR CONDITIONING ON THE GND; AND NOT MERELY FROM RUNNING THE APU AND PUMPING EXHAUST FUMES INSIDE. THE CAPT; THEREFORE; DIRECTED THAT THE APU BE STARTED AND USED FOR ENG START. SUBSEQUENT TO STARTING 1 ENG AND TAXIING OUT WITH THE OTHER ONE STILL SHUT DOWN; SO AS TO SAVE FUEL; I REVERTED TO OLD USUAL HABITS AND TURNED ON THE L AIR CONDITIONING PACK USING AIR FROM THE NOW-RUNNING L ENG AND THE R PACK USING THE AIR FROM THE APU. CLRLY; THIS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DONE SINCE 3 OR 4 MINS AFTERWARD; THE AFT FLT ATTENDANT CAME FORWARD TO ADVISE THAT THERE WAS SMOKE COMING INTO THE CABIN AND BOTH LAVATORY SMOKE DETECTORS WERE SOUNDING. IMMEDIATELY; I TURNED OFF THE R AIR CONDITIONING PACK TO ELIMINATE THE SMOKE SOURCE. WE NEXT STARTED THE R ENG AND USED ITS AIR TO CLR OUT THE SMOKE AS RAPIDLY AS POSSIBLE. AS TO CAUSE; IT'S CLR THE PRIMARY ONE IS MY FAILURE TO REMEMBER NOT TO USE THE APU AS A SOURCE OF AIR AND TURNING ON THE R AIR CONDITIONING PACK AFTER STARTING ONLY THE L ENG. CONTRIBUTING ALSO I BELIEVE; WAS THE CAPT'S DEVIATING FROM MEL PROCS BY USING THE APU WHEN IT WAS NOT NECESSARY; AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN L OFF TO BEGIN WITH. UNFORTUNATELY; THIS WAS JUST ONE MORE OF THE INSTANCES DURING THIS 3 DAY TRIP WHEN THIS CAPT DEVIATED FROM RECOMMENDED OR REGULATED PROC. IN THIS CASE; I WAS CAUGHT COMPOUNDING THE DEV BY DOING JUST WHAT THE 'TOTALLY INOP' NATURE OF THE MEL PROCS TRIED TO AVOID. I FEEL THE FIRST CORRECTIVE ACTION WOULD BE TO FOLLOW PROCS IN ALL INSTANCES. HAD WE COMPLIED WITH THE MEL; AND L THE APU OFF TO BEGIN WITH; THERE NEVER WOULD HAVE BEEN A CHANCE FOR THIS PROBLEM OCCURRING.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.