FLC OF MLG ACR ACFT EXPERIENCED RADIO TRANSPONDER EQUIP MALFUNCTIONS RESULTING IN BECOMING OFF COURSE AND ATC INTERVENING TO CORRECT THE ACFT'S FLT PATH.
Synopsis
FLC OF MLG ACR ACFT EXPERIENCED RADIO TRANSPONDER EQUIP MALFUNCTIONS RESULTING IN BECOMING OFF COURSE AND ATC INTERVENING TO CORRECT THE ACFT'S FLT PATH.
Narrative
DEPARTING THE DCA ARPT ON APR/TUE/92 TO THE S; AND DURING CLBOUT; ATC FIRST ADVISED AND RPTED THAT THEY WERE NOT RECEIVING OUR ALT TRANSPONDER READOUT RPT. I THEN RECYCLED OUR TRANSPONDER FROM 'ON' TO 'STANDBY' AND BACK TO 'ON;' THEN SWITCHED FROM '#1 TRANSPONDER' TO '#2 TRANSPONDER;' AND NEXT FROM '#1 ALT RPT' TO '#2 ALT RPT.' AFTER ALL THIS ATC ADVISED THAT OUR TRANSPONDER RPT WAS 'INTERMITTED; BUT THAT WE WERE IN RADAR CONTACT.' AT LEVEL OFF AT 17000 FT; ATC RPTED OUR ALT TRANSPONDER READOUT TO BE '17500 FT' AND ASKED US TO VERIFY OUR ALT. OUR ALT WAS 17000 FT; AND I VERIFIED THIS TO ATC; NEXT SWITCHING FROM TRANSPONDER ALT RPTING SYS FROM #1 TO #2. ATC THEN ADVISED RECEIVING OUR ALT RPT AS 'LEVEL AT 17000 FT.' ON ARR AT OUR DEST CLE; I MADE A LOGBOOK ENTRY FOR OUR TRANSPONDER PROBLEM; AND MAINT FOUND AND CORRECTED A LOOSE ANTENNA CONNECTION ON OUR TRANSPONDER RPTR BOX. ON THIS SAME FLT; MY FO FLYING; WE WERE RECEIVING ATC VECTORS FROM THE DCA DEP CTL; AND THEN HANDED OFF TO ZDC WHILE STILL ON AN ASSIGNED VECTOR HDG FOR WX AVOIDANCE. WHEN THE FO COURSE NEEDLE CTRED ON THE AIRWAY HE TURNED ON COURSE J-111; APPROX 40 DME EMI; ATC CALLED US AND GAVE US A 20 DEG L HDG CHANGE TO REINTERCEPT J-111; RPTING US TO BE OFF COURSE? I THEN MATCHED THE #1 NAV RECEIVER TO THAT OF THE #2 NAV RECEIVER; AND FOUND A 30 DEG DIFFERENCE BTWN THE 2 RECEIVERS. I RPTED THIS TO ATC; GIVING THEM THE INFO WHICH I HAD ON THE INCORRECT RECEPTION OF OUR #2 NAV RECEIVER. ATC NEXT AGAIN GAVE US ANOTHER OFF AIRWAY J-111 HDG TO THE S FOR WX AVOIDANCE AND TFC. WHEN CLR OF WX WE WERE AGAIN CLRED DIRECT TO JST. WHILE PROCEEDING DIRECT TO JST; ATC SHORTLY THEREAFTER GAVE US A 100 DEG L HDG CHANGE TO RETURN TO THE DIRECT COURSE TO JST; ADVISING US THAT WE WERE ABOUT TO ENTER ZNY'S AIRSPACE? FO #2 NAV RECEIVER AGAIN DISPLAYED THE PARTIAL FAIL FLAG (LESS THAN 1/2 THE LOC - VOR FLAG) WITH CDI NEEDLE SLIGHTLY R OF COURSE; CORRECT IDENT AND DME. WHILE PREPARING TO CONTINUE WITH THIS ACFT TO IAH AND PERFORMING THE 'RECEIVING ACFT CHKLIST' AND TUNING UP THE NAV RADIOS; THE FO'S CDI FAIL FLAG AGAIN APPEARED (LESS THAN 1/2 VOR - LOC FLAG SHOWING). MAINT WAS CALLED TO RETURN TO THE ACFT. FO'S CDI WAS WRITTEN UP AGAIN IN THE ACFT LOG; AND MAINT CHANGED OUT THE FO'S CDI DISPLAY. IN MY OPINION WX AND PRECIPITATION DID PLAY A PROBLEM IN NAVING DCA TO J-111; AND FROM EMI TO JST; IN THAT THERE WERE MANY ACFT DEVIATING FOR WX; AND ATC WAS EXTREMELY BUSY. HOWEVER; TWICE I HAD MADE RPTS TO ATC THAT OUR FLT WAS RECEIVING VOR NAV RECEPTION AND INDICATION PROBLEMS; AND I FELL THAT ATC COULD HAVE KEPT A BETTER EYE ON US THAN THEY DID. A 100 DEG HDG CHANGE IS EXTREMELY ALARMING TO ME AS A PLT WHEN GIVEN THE CTLR'S TONE AND PITCH IN HIS VOICE THAT WE WERE ENTERING SOMEONE ELSE'S AIRSPACE? I DO NOT KNOW WHAT I OR MY FO COULD HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY THAN I HAVE DESCRIBED ABOVE.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.