AN SMA PLT WAS UNCLR IN HIS MIND WHAT ATC MEANT WITH 'RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR OWN TERRAIN CLRNC'.

Date: 1992-08 · Aircraft: Small Aircraft; Low Wing; 1 Eng; Retractable Gear

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|other-unspecified

Synopsis

AN SMA PLT WAS UNCLR IN HIS MIND WHAT ATC MEANT WITH 'RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR OWN TERRAIN CLRNC'.

Narrative

WE WERE AT 8000 FT. HAD JUST BEEN HANDED OFF TO MRY APCH FOR DSCNT INTO MRY. WE WERE TOLD TO EXPECT A VISUAL APCH AT MRY AND TO RPT ARPT IN SIGHT. I ASKED TO BEGIN MY DSCNT; SO AS TO KEEP THE RATE OF DSCNT REASONABLE AND WAS TOLD 'YOU CAN DSND IF YOU WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR OWN TERRAIN CLRNC.' I REPLIED THAT I WOULD ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY; AND BEGAN A DSCNT. REFERRING TO THE SECTIONAL CHART TOLD ME I COULD DSND WITHOUT A TERRAIN PROBLEM; ALTHOUGH ON LATER CONSIDERATION; MY CLRNC MAY HAVE BEEN LESS THAN THE 2000 FT REQUIRED IN MOUNTAINOUS AREA. THE BIGGER PROBLEM WAS THAT I WAS GIVEN NO ALT TO DSND 'TO'. WAS I ALREADY AT THE MVA? HOW LOW COULD I GO? WAS THERE NO TFC BELOW ME THAT NEEDED TO BE SEPARATED FROM ME? THE PROBLEM WENT AWAY VERY QUICKLY AS I GOT VISUAL CONTACT WITH ARPT AND WAS CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH. IF I HAD IT TO DO OVER; I WOULD QUESTION THE CTLR'S RATHER INCOMPLETE CLRNC. WHAT IS THE MVA? HOW LOW CAN I DSND ONCE CLR OF TERRAIN? OR I COULD HAVE REQUESTED A CONTACT APCH BEFORE HAVING ARPT IN SIGHT.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.