SMA PLT ON SIGHT SEEING FLT DOES NOT CLR CTL ZONE AND DOES NOT REMAIN CLR OF LOC.
Synopsis
SMA PLT ON SIGHT SEEING FLT DOES NOT CLR CTL ZONE AND DOES NOT REMAIN CLR OF LOC.
Narrative
UPON ARR AT BMI ARPT; I NOTICED THE BEACON WAS NOT ACTIVATED; ALTHOUGH CEILINGS LOOKED TO BE LESS THAN 3000 FT. ATIS CONFIRMED 3000 FT AND 3 MI. ATC CLRED ME FOR A PLEASURE FLT OVER BLOOMINGTON BUT REQUESTED TO STAY S OF LOC. MY THOUGHT WAS TO STAY S AND SW OF ARPT; BECAUSE I WAS UNSURE WHERE LOC WAS. LATER; APPROX 5 - 5 1/2 MI SW OF ARPT; I FELT CEILING WAS LOWER AND VISIBILITY WAS DEFINITELY DIMINISHING. I REQUESTED A 180 DEG L TURN (FROM MY 260 DEG HDG) BACK TO ARPT FOR LNDG. TWR DIRECTED I MAKE A R BASE RWY 11. I CONFIRMED THAT I WAS TO TURN N FOR A R BASE TO RWY 11? THE DIRECTIVE WAS REPEATED. I MADE R TURN TO NE AND COULD NOT SEE OR SPOT THE ARPT. I REALIZED I WAS TOO FAR N. HAVING TUNED VOR TO 110 DEGS (VOR IS ON FIELD AND AT SW INTXN OF RWY 11/29 AND 030/22 NEEDLE WAS STILL TO THE L). I SPOTTED RWY 11 AND MENTALLY CONFIRMED I WAS NW OF IT. TWR CALLED REMINDING ME OF HIS DIRECTIVE AND ADVISING A TURN TO S IMMEDIATELY. I DID. AS SOON AS I DID; I SAW A SCHEDULED CARRIER COMMUTER TWIN PROP COMING IN EASTERLY DIRECTION. I RELATED INFO TO TWR WITH MY JUDGEMENT TO TURN NE TO STAY CLR. TWR RESPONDED STANDING ON HIS DIRECTIVE TO CONTINUE S. I DID. SECONDS LATER; I REALIZED HE WAS MUCH FURTHER BEHIND ME THAN I FIRST THOUGHT. I CONTINUED S UNTIL CLRED FOR LNDG RWY 11. HAVING PLANNED 2 FLTS; I TOOK SECOND FLT. TWR AGAIN SAID TO CLR CTL ZONE TO S. AS I WENT OUT TO SW I MADE MENTAL NOTE TO CLR CTL ZONE AT SW QUADRANT. VISIBILITY BEING THE SAME OUT THERE; I REQUESTED A TURN TO 300 DEGS; THEN INBOUND TO LAND. REQUEST WAS APPROVED AND I FLEW NE TO DIAMOND STAR MOTORS (APPROX 5 MI WNW OF BMI). LOOKING FOR RWY 11 AS I TURNED INBOUND; I SPOTTED ARPT; SET UP APCH; AND LANDED. I WENT IN AND TALKED TO TWR OPERATOR WHO INFORMED ME PEORIA RADAR CLAIMED I NEVER ACTUALLY CLRED CTL ZONE; ON SECOND FLT. I LISTENED INTENTLY; THEN EXPLAINED MY INABILITY TO SPOT RWY AS ONE POSSIBILITY FOR MY ACTIONS. HE SAID COMMUTER'S TCASII WENT OFF AND PLANE EXECUTED L 360 DEG TURN BEFORE LNDG. CAPT WOULD FILL OUT A RPT. TWR SAID HE DID NOT HAVE NASA FORM FOR ME; AND HE DID NOT PUT THIS SIT INTO THE 'LOGS.' MY PERCEPTION OF MY POS WAS OBVIOUSLY NOT CLR TO ME EVEN THOUGH I ATTEMPTED TO USE VOR; SCANNING TECHNIQUES; AND GND POSITIONING OF LANDMARKS TO PLACE WHERE ARPT SHOULD BE LOCATED. THE MIN OR 2 THAT I USED WAS ENOUGH (COUPLED WITH TAILWIND) WAS TOO MUCH TIME. MY JUDGEMENT EARLY ON; EVEN NOW THINKING ABOUT IT; TO HAVE MADE A L TURN AND SET UP FOR A L BASE TO RWY 11 MAY HAVE AVOIDED THIS SIT. CERTAINLY THE DECISION NOT TO FLY AT ALL WOULD'VE BEEN A SURE CURE. DECIDING TO FOLLOW ATC 'N' REQUEST RAISED NO QUESTION OF INTERSECTING TFC BEING SO CLOSE; IN MY MIND. WHILE MY ACTIONS OF 'HUNTING' FOR THE ARPT CONTRIBUTED TO MY WORKLOAD; THE CONFUSION OF MY INABILITY TO PLACE MY OWN POS ONLY MADE MATTERS WORSE. I CANNOT OVERLOOK THE FACT THAT WHILE MY PAX WONDERED 'WHAT WAS TWR'S PROB;' I WAS NOT PROVIDING THE LEVEL OF COMFORT AND SAFETY THAT I HAVE COME TO PRIDE MYSELF AS A RECORD OF SUCH. WHILE WX WAS A FACTOR IN THIS SIT; THE LACK OF A SMALL PIECE OF KNOWLEDGE LOOMED SIGNIFICANT ALSO. ASKING WHERE LOC IS LOCATED MAY HAVE FELT EMBARRASSING OR UNCOMFORTABLE; IT MAY HAVE BEEN THE PIECE I NEEDED TO PRESENT A CLEARER PICTURE; THUS ELIMINATING AT LEAST SOME OF THE CONFUSION. I HAVE DECIDED I WILL TAKE INSTRUCTION FROM A CFI IN THE NEXT 2 WKS IN ANY MANNER HE/SHE PRESCRIBES TO HELP ME PROPERLY PREPARE FOR INCREASED WORKLOADS WHEN COMMUNICATING WITH ATC; APCH; DEP IN THE FUTURE.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.