ALTDEV EXCURSION FROM ASSIGNED DUE TO EVASIVE ACTION DSCNT TO AVOID VFR XING TFC. LOTS OF UNKNOWN VFR TFC IN AREA.
Synopsis
ALTDEV EXCURSION FROM ASSIGNED DUE TO EVASIVE ACTION DSCNT TO AVOID VFR XING TFC. LOTS OF UNKNOWN VFR TFC IN AREA.
Narrative
ON A RECENT IFR FLT PLAN FLT IN VFR CONDITIONS; I WAS BEING VECTORED TO THE FINAL APCH COURSE FOR LVK AND WAS ADVISED TO MAINTAIN 3300 TO FOOTO INTXN. MY SAFETY PLT COULD SEE A LOT OF VFR TFC IN THE AREA AND AT ABOUT 8 NM E OF THE TCY ARPT; I DSNDED TO 2800 TO AVOID A POTENTIAL CONFLICT. THE PROB IS THAT I DID NOT NOTIFY APCH OF MY INTENTIONS AND THE ALREADY BUSY CTLR ASKED IF I WAS INITIATING THE DSCNT EARLY; MISTAKING TCY FOR LVK. TO COMPLICATE MATTERS; I REMOVED MY HOOD AND SAW THE ARPT'S RWY 25 DIRECTLY IN FRONT AND BELOW! FOR A 'SPLIT-SECOND' (MENTAL TRANSITION TO VFR); I LOST TRACK OF FOOTO INTXN AND; IN A HURRIED RESPONSE TO THE CTLR'S QUERY; REPLIED; 'I MUST HAVE' (CONFUSED TCY WITH LVK). IT TOOK A FEW MORE SECONDS TO VERIFY FOOTO ON #2 NAV AND I TOLD THE CTLR WE WERE CLBING BACK TO 3300 -- BUT WITHOUT EXPLANATION. A SHORT TIME LATER; THE CTLR HAD TO VECTOR US AROUND ANOTHER CONFLICTING VFR ACFT MANEUVERING THROUGH OUR FLT PATH. WITH THIS OUT OF THE WAY; WE RETURNED TO COURSE AND COMPETED AN ILS APCH TO LVK. LESSON LEARNED -- IT IS MORE DIFFICULT TO FLY IFR IN CROWDED VFR CONDITIONS; TRYING TO SEE AND AVOID (CTLR ADVISED AND NOT ADVISED) TFC AND COMPLY WITH IFR RESPONSIBILITIES. CERTAINLY; WE SHOULD HAVE TOLD THE CTLR THE REASON FOR OUR ALTDEV WHEN TIME PERMITTED.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.