PLT OF TWIN TURBO PROP TAKES EVASIVE ACTION BY TURNING AND CLBING TO AVOID ANOTHER ACFT ON SHORT FINAL AT UNCTLED ARPT.

Date: 1994-11 · Aircraft: Beechcraft Twin Turboprop or Jet Undifferentiated or Other Model

Anomalies: conflict-nmac|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-other-unknown|other-unspecified

Synopsis

PLT OF TWIN TURBO PROP TAKES EVASIVE ACTION BY TURNING AND CLBING TO AVOID ANOTHER ACFT ON SHORT FINAL AT UNCTLED ARPT.

Narrative

WHEN IN THE TFC PATTERN ON DOWNWIND TO LAND ON RWY 26. WE HEARD A CESSNA ON FINAL ON THE CTAF. WE DID NOT SEE THE ACFT. WHILE TURNING BASE TO FINAL 3 MI OUT WE HEARD THE SAME CESSNA CALL 'SHORT FINAL.' AGAIN BOTH CREW MEMBERS DID NOT SEE THE AIRPLANE DUE TO HAVING TO LOOK INTO A VERY BRIGHT LATE AFTERNOON SETTING SUN WITH THE CESSNA ON SHORT FINAL WE CONTINUED THE APCH. ON A 1 1/2 MI FINAL THE ARPT FUELER/MGR CALLED US AND SAID THAT WE WERE VERY CLOSE TO THE CESSNA. IN LATER CONVERSATION THE DISTANCE WAS DESCRIBED AS 6 ACFT LENGTHS. (DIFFICULT TO SAY DUE TO ANGLE OF VIEWING; ETC). WE STILL DIDN'T SEE THE CESSNA SO I BEGAN A CLBING L TURN. AFTER DEPARTING THE PATTERN TO THE S SEVERAL (5-6) AIRPLANES BEGAN RPTING POS IN THE PATTERN. I REMEMBERED THE PATTERN ON A R XWIND (R TFC FOR RWY 26) AND LANDED. I ASKED THE ARPT MGR AND TFC TO CHANGE TO RWY 3 TO AVOID THE SUN. HE REPLIED THAT THE WIND (XWIND) WAS TOO GREAT FOR RWY 3. THE WIND WOULD HAVE BEEN 5-8 KTS AND 30-45 DEGS. I BELIEVE THAT THE XWIND CONDITION WOULD HAVE BEEN SAFER THAN THE SUN-IN -YOUR- EYES CONDITION.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.