ATC USE OF VISUAL SEPARATION SEQUENCING WHEN WX CONDITIONS PRECLUDE ITS USAGE.

Date: 1994-12 · Aircraft: Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer · Phase: approach

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|inflight-event-encounter-weather-turbulence|other-unspecified

Synopsis

ATC USE OF VISUAL SEPARATION SEQUENCING WHEN WX CONDITIONS PRECLUDE ITS USAGE.

Narrative

GIVING LINE CHK TO CREW AND OBSERVED THIS APCH. THE WX WAS RPTED VFR WITH A SOLID OVCST AROUND 3000 FT. ATL APCH CTL ASKED IF CREW SAW ACFT AHEAD. CREW INDICATED THEY DID AND WAS AUTOMATICALLY GIVEN A VISUAL CLRNC TO FOLLOW THAT ACFT FOR RWY 8L. THE WX WAS CLR ABOVE THE OVCST AND THE CREW WAS BTWN 6000-5000 FT TURNING TO FINAL FROM BASE. APCH WAS CLRING EVERYONE THE SAME WAY AND RUNNING PARALLEL APCH. AS TFC ENTERED THE OVCST; PLTS WERE DECLARING THE LOSS OF VISUAL ON THEIR TFC. THIS OBSERVED CREW ALSO CORRECTLY DECLARED THEIR LOSS VISUAL WITH THE TFC. THIS IS ALL LEGAL ACCORDING TO AM 03-14 AND COMPANY OPS SPECS. IF THE RADIO HAD BEEN BUSIER AS THEY GENERALLY ARE IN ATL; IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO DECLARE THIS LOSS OF VISUAL AS REQUIRED IN THE FARS -- ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE AT TIMES. THEN WHAT DOES A CREW DO? WHY ACCEPT OR GIVE A VISUAL ON TFC; IF YOU KNOW THAT IT CAN'T BE FOLLOWED THROUGHOUT THE APCH TO LNDG? THIS IS NOT A SAFE OP FOR A BUSY ARPT WITH PARALLEL APCHS AND PUSHES LIMITS OF LEGALITY. SUGGESTIONS: CHANGE AM 03-14 TO READ THAT TFC MUST BE KEPT IN SIGHT DURING APCH TO LNDG IN ORDER TO ACCEPT A 'FOLLOW TFC VISUALLY' FOR APCH CLRNC. CHANGE ATC PROCS FOR VISUAL CLRNCS TO FOLLOW TFC CAN ONLY BE GIVEN FOR APCHS IF IT IS VFR FROM THE POINT OF VISUAL CLRNC TO TOUCHDOWN. NEVER ABOVE A BROKEN/OVCST SKY CONDITION.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.