CAPT OF A WDB FAILED TO FOLLOW THE RTING AND ATC NOTIFICATIONS DURING A DEP OF A NEW DEP PROC.

Date: 1995-04 · Aircraft: B767 Undifferentiated or Other Model · Phase: climb

Anomalies: deviation-track-heading-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance|other-unspecified

Synopsis

CAPT OF A WDB FAILED TO FOLLOW THE RTING AND ATC NOTIFICATIONS DURING A DEP OF A NEW DEP PROC.

Narrative

I WAS MET AT LAX OPS BY (ACR CGP) AND BRIEFED THAT WE WERE TO CONDUCT A TEST OF THE ANGEL 1 FMS PROC AND HE BROUGHT TO MY ATTN A NOTE ATTACHED TO OUR FLT PLAN. MY FO WAS TO FLY THE DEP AND I INITIALLY BRIEFED HIM TO ENGAGE LNAV INSTEAD OF HDG SELECT AFTER TKOF. WE BOTH HAD OUR 10-3-1 PLATES OUT. I THEN READ THE TKOF NOTE SECTION AND THAT IS WHEN I MADE THE MISTAKE OF USING THE RWY 24 TKOF PROC INSTEAD OF THE RWY 25. I CHANGED THE BRIEF TO A 250 HDG SELECT AND TO EXPECT DIRECT PEVEE. THE NEXT ERROR I MADE WAS TO NOT READ THE FLT PLAN NOTE CAREFULLY ENOUGH AS REGARDS NOTIFYING EACH CTLING AGENCY THAT WE WERE FLYING THE ANGEL 1. THE NOTE WAS CLR AND THE 10-3-1 PAGE WAS CLR. I MADE A PLT ERROR WHICH AS PIC I WAS TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE. LATER I RE-READ THE 10-3-1 PAGE SO CAREFULLY THAT I EVEN NOTICED A TYPO ERROR IN THE LAST SENTENCE OF VIS INSTEAD OF VIA. IF ONLY I HAD READ IT THAT CAREFULLY BEFORE THE FACT. I THINK THAT THE ANGEL 1 FMS PROC WOULD BE A BIG BENEFIT TO PLTS AND CTLRS AND I DEEPLY REGRET THAT I WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TERMINATION OF THE TEST.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.