TFC PATTERN PROC. A TRAINING FLT REQUESTED A TOUCH-AND-GO FROM THE TWR AND NOT RECEIVING THE CLRNC DID ONE ANYWAY.
Synopsis
TFC PATTERN PROC. A TRAINING FLT REQUESTED A TOUCH-AND-GO FROM THE TWR AND NOT RECEIVING THE CLRNC DID ONE ANYWAY.
Narrative
SALEM TWR CLRED OUR TRAINER TO LAND. WE THEN REQUESTED A TOUCH-AND-GO. WITHOUT OBTAINING THE REQUESTS CLRNC NXXX DID EXECUTE A TOUCH-AND-GO. THE STUDENT IS AN ELDERLY GENTLEMAN WHOM IS HAVING DIFFICULTY AVIATING; NAVING AND COMMUNICATING IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER. THE FLT INSTRUCTOR WAS FRUSTRATED ALMOST TO DESPAIR THUS ALSO A LITTLE DISTRACTED. THE FLT INSTRUCTOR KNEW THE VERY INSTANT THE TWR CALLED WHAT THEIR ERROR HAD BEEN. IN THE FUTURE THIS FLT INSTRUCTOR WILL PAY MORE CAREFUL ATTN TO CTLR INSTRUCTIONS. THE TWR WAS PHONED SEVERAL TIMES AS REQUESTED; BUT THERE WAS NO ANSWER. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE INSTRUCTOR PLT SAID THAT HE ATTEMPTED TO CALL THE TWR AS INSTRUCTED; BUT NOBODY ANSWERED. THE STUDENT WAS AN EXPERIENCED PLT; BUT HE WAS NOT PERFORMING VERY WELL. THE STUDENT WAS HAVING TROUBLE STAYING AHEAD OF THE C-152 AND THE INSTRUCTOR WAS DISTRACTED TRYING TO KEEP THE STUDENT AND THE ACFT UNDER CTL AND HE DID NOT REALIZE THAT THE TOUCH-AND-GO MANEUVER HAD NOT BEEN APPROVED. THE TWR CTLR ASKED THE INSTRUCTOR TO CALL HIM AFTER HE LANDED; BUT AFTER NUMEROUS ATTEMPTS AND NO ANSWER THE INSTRUCTOR GAVE UP. THE STUDENT WAS KILLED SEVERAL WKS LATER WHILE PERFORMING ALT AEROBATICS IN HIS OWN ACFT.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.