PLT COMPLAINT OF CURRENT REGISTRATION NOT CARRIED IN THE ACFT DURING OPS.

Date: 1995-07 · Aircraft: Light Transport; Low Wing; 2 Turbojet Eng · Phase: ground

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far|other-unspecified

Synopsis

PLT COMPLAINT OF CURRENT REGISTRATION NOT CARRIED IN THE ACFT DURING OPS.

Narrative

I LIKE TO RPT ON ONGOING VIOLATION. THE CORPORATION I WORK FOR OPERATES 2 BAE800. ON JAN/XQ/95 THE CORPORATION AGREED TO A CO-OWNER AND (CO-AGREEMENT) WITH ANOTHER CORPORATION. THE COMPANY FILED AC 8050-1 WITH THE FAA BUT THE CHIEF PLT NEVER PUT THE 'PINK SLIP' ON THE ACFT AS REQUIRED. HE KEPT THE 'PINK SLIP' IN HIS OFFICE WHERE THEY ARE STILL TODAY (OUT-BOX BEHIND HIS DESK!) THE COMPANY OPERATED THE ACFT(S) SEVERAL TIMES ON AN INTL FLT TO CANADA. PART 122 AIR COMMERCE REGS 122.27 (C) (2). IN APRIL ONE NEW REGISTRATION (AC 8050-3) LISTING BOTH COMPANIES AS CO-OWNERS OF THE (1) ACFT ARRIVED AND WAS PUT ON THE RESPECTIVE ACFT BY THE CHIEF OF MAINT. THE NEW REGISTRATION FOR THE 2ND ACFT HAS NOT BEEN PUT ON THE RESPECTIVE ACFT AS OF TODAY. IN ADDITION TO THE PROBS WITH THE REGISTRATION; CURRENT 'TIME SHARING AGREEMENTS' DO NOT REFLECT THE CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP. 2 PREVIOUS AGREEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN AMENDED AND THE 3RD MOST RECENT AGREEMENT WHICH WAS SIGNED JUN/XX/95 DOES NOT SHOW BOTH COMPANIES AS CO-OWNERS EITHER. IN ADDITION; THE LAST AGREEMENT IS NOT BEING CARRIED ON THE ACFT EVEN WHEN THE LESSEE USES THE ACFT UNDER THE TIME SHARING AGREEMENT. (MKC-DCU-MKC) WE WERE 'FORCED' TO FLY UNDER THE CURRENT SIT UNLESS WE WANT TO LOOSE OUR JOBS OVER SOME 'PAPER WORK ISSUE.' WE BELIEVE THAT THE FAA WOULD NOT 'CLEAN UP' THIS SIT BECAUSE OF THE LCL INFLUENCE THIS COMPANY HAS. IN ADDITION; A PREVIOUS SIT (2 YRS AGO) ABOUT ILLEGAL GENERATORS; ALTERNATORS; ETC; AND FALSIFICATION OF ACFT LOGBOOKS WHICH WAS BROUGHT TO THE ATTN OF THE CEO; CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND HIS ASSISTANT; WAS COVERED UP BY THE COMPANY. THIS SIT RESULTED IN FIRING OF 1 PLT AND THE 'HARASSMENT' OF THE REMAINING 'WHISTLE BLOWERS.' WE CANNOT GET THIS SIT RESOLVED BECAUSE WE HAD EXHAUSTED ALL POSSIBILITIES 2 YRS AGO WITH THE CEO TURNING HIS BACK ON US WITH A MORE SERIOUS PROB. THE CHIEF PLT IS IN FULL CTL WITH NO; OR VERY LITTLE REGARD FOR THE FAR'S; AND WE CAN ONLY HOPE NOT TO GET CAUGHT.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.