RPTR INADVERTENTLY ACTUATED PROP FLT IDLE INTERLOCK SYS.

Date: 1995-08 · Aircraft: Brasilia EMB-120 All Series · Phase: approach

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|other-unspecified

Synopsis

RPTR INADVERTENTLY ACTUATED PROP FLT IDLE INTERLOCK SYS.

Narrative

I JUST SCARED THE BLEEP OUT OF MYSELF. I AM A PAST MEMBER OF AN E120 PROP OVERSPD COMMITTEE. ONE OF THE OPINIONS OF THAT COMMITTEE WAS THAT EXPERIENCED PLTS (IN THE E120) WOULD NOT UNKNOWINGLY MOVE THE PWR LEVERS BELOW FLT IDLE INFLT. I HAVE JUST CHANGED MY OPINION. IT IS WELL KNOWN AND AGREED THAT MOVING THE LOWER LEVERS BELOW FLT IDLE INFLT WILL CAUSE AN IMMEDIATE PROP OVERSPD. IF NOT CORRECTED WITHIN 1-2 SECONDS IT WILL LEAD TO DESTRUCTION OF THE PWR SECTION. THIS IS AN EXTREMELY SERIOUS EVENT. AS SUCH; A FLT IDLE INTERLOCK SOLENOID SYS HAS BEEN RETROFITTED INTO ALL E120'S. THERE IS ALSO AN AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE FOR THE PLTS TO CHK THIS SYS'S CIRCUIT BREAKERS DAILY. NOW FOR THE INCIDENT THAT SCARED ME. WE WERE ON 10 MI FINAL TO SFO RWY 28R. WE WERE ON NORMAL DSCNT PROFILE. I WAS A LITTLE FAST (MAYBE 10 KTS) SO I REDUCED PWR TO FLT IDLE; AND UNCONSCIOUSLY PULLED UP ON THE PWR LEVER FLT IDLE RELEASES. AS SOON AS I DID IT; I REALIZED WHAT MY HANDS WERE DOING AND PUSHED THE PWR LEVERS FORWARD. THE PWR LEVERS MOVED ABOVE FLT IDLE WITH AN AUDIBLE CLICK. ONCE IN THE GATE I CHKED THE CIRCUIT BREAKERS AND TESTED THE SYS. IT WORKED. I WAS SURPRISED TO FIND IT ALLOWED THE PWR LEVERS TO MOVE FRACTIONALLY BELOW FLT IDLE. THERE HAVE BEEN NUMEROUS PROBS (HENCE THE DAILY CIRCUIT BREAKER CHK AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE) WITH THE FLT IDLE SOLENOID INTERLOCKS. A MORE POSITIVE FLT IDLE GATING SYS IS NEEDED. THE ONLY THING STANDING BTWN ME AND DISASTER TODAY WAS MY QUICK REALIZATION OF WHAT I'D DONE AND A TEMPERAMENTAL INTERLOCK SYS. AND I'M MUCH MORE COGNIZANT OF THE DANGER THAN THE AVERAGE LINE PLT. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR FELT THE CATASTROPHIC CONSEQUENCES OF A PROP RUNAWAY/ENG DESTRUCTION CALLED FOR GREATER DESIGN PROTECTION THAN CURRENTLY EXISTS. BECAUSE OF THE CUSTOMARY USE OF THE REVERSE ON LNDG ROLL AND DURING TAXIING AND BECAUSE OF THE COMFORTABLE POS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FINGERS AROUND RELEASE LEVER IT WOULD EASILY BE FORESEEABLE THAT A PLT WOULD INADVERTENTLY MOVE THE REVERSE LOCK LEVER AT IDLE WHILE INFLT AS A RESULT OF REFLEXIVE MUSCLE MEMORY. IF THE FLT INTERLOCK WERE FAILED THE PROP WOULD RUN AWAY. EMBRAER MECHS DO CHKS THAT REQUIRE PULLING THE AIR/GND SENSOR CIRCUIT BREAKER. WITH THAT CIRCUIT BREAKER PULLED THE FLT INTERLOCK CIRCUIT BREAKER MAY POP. THERE IS A PROC TO CHK THAT CIRCUIT BREAKER THROUGH A VIEWING WINDOW. EVEN SO; IN THE LAST 1000 HRS THE RPTR HAS EXPERIENCED 3 INTERLOCK SYS FAILURES. THE RPTR WAS NOT SURE OF THE SCENARIOS THAT CAUSE THE FLT INTERLOCK CIRCUIT BREAKER TO POP OR THE REASONS THE FLT INTERLOCK SOLENOID WOULD FAIL; BUT; ALL TOO OFTEN THE PROTECTION IS NOT WORKING.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.