SMT CPR JET WAS OPERATED WITH A PAX DURING AN AFTER MAINT TEST FLT. IN ADDITION; THE ACFT DID NOT INCLUDE SOME INTERIOR FURNISHINGS AND A CURRENT REGISTRATION OR WT AND BAL DATA.
Synopsis
SMT CPR JET WAS OPERATED WITH A PAX DURING AN AFTER MAINT TEST FLT. IN ADDITION; THE ACFT DID NOT INCLUDE SOME INTERIOR FURNISHINGS AND A CURRENT REGISTRATION OR WT AND BAL DATA.
Narrative
ON OCT/SAT/95 I ACTED AS SIC ABOARD A CE500 DURING MAINT TEST FLT; TO TEST THE PRESSURIZATION SYS. WE DEPARTED FROM CAE AND WERE FILED IFR TO FLY TO SAV AND BACK TO CAE; ROUND ROBIN. THE OWNER OF THE ACFT AND THE MECH AUTHORIZING THE FLT WERE ON BOARD. DURING THE FLT; WE DIVERTED TO 49J AT THE REQUEST OF THE OWNER AND APPROVAL OF THE MECH DUE TO A FAMILY EMER THE OWNER SAID HE HAD. ONCE WE ARRIVED AT 49J; I WAS TOLD TO GO HOME BY THE OWNER AND NOT TO RETURN TO THE ACFT. I WAS NOT ALLOWED TO ACT AS SIC TO GET THE ACFT BACK TO THE MAINT FACILITY AT CAE WHERE IT COULD BE PROPERLY RELEASED BY THE MAINT FACILITY TO THE OWNER. I BELIEVE THE ACFT SHOULD HAVE BEEN RETURNED TO CAE. FIRST; I AM AWARE THAT AT THE TIME OF THE FLT; CERTAIN ITEMS WERE MISSING FROM THE ACFT'S CABIN INTERIOR; SUCH AS THE TOILET AND SOME SIDE PANELS AND SOME CARPET. I BROUGHT THIS MATTER TO THE PIC'S ATTN; BUT HE FELT THE MISSING ITEMS DID NOT AFFECT THE AIRWORTHINESS OF THE ACFT. HOWEVER; I THINK ALL THE ITEMS ON AN ACFT'S EQUIP LIST AND ANY NEW EQUIP ADDED BY FORM 337; MUST BE PRESENT IN THE ACFT AND WORKING AT THE TIME OF THE FLT BY FAR. I RELIED ON THE PIC AND MECH'S JUDGEMENT IN THIS MATTER. SECOND; I AM UNAWARE OF THIS ACFT'S EXACT MAINT STATUS AT THE TIME OF THE FLT. I DO KNOW THAT THE MECH WORKING ON THE ACFT AUTH THIS FLT. THE MECH WAS ALSO PRESENT DURING THE FLT. I AM UNSURE IF I HAVE VIOLATED THE FARS BY BEING A REQUIRED CREW MEMBER (SIC) ON A MAINT TEST FLT THAT CARRIED MEMBERS ON BOARD OTHER THAN REQUIRED CREW MEMBERS (IE; THE OWNER). I BROUGHT THIS MATTER TO THE PIC'S ATTN PRIOR TO THE FLT; AND HE FELT THE OWNER WAS ALLOWED ABOARD THE ACFT DURING THIS FLT. I RELIED ON THE PIC AND MECH'S JUDGEMENT IN THIS MATTER. THIRD; I NOTED PRIOR TO THE FLT TO THE PIC; THAT THE ACFT DID NOT HAVE THE CURRENT OWNER'S REGISTRATION ON BOARD. IT DID HAVE THE PREVIOUS OWNER'S REGISTRATION ON BOARD; HOWEVER. I WAS TOLD THAT THE OWNER HAD APPLIED FOR THE PROPER REGISTRATION FORM AND HAD RECEIVED IT AND THAT IT WAS IN HILTON HEAD (49J). I TOLD THE PIC THAT THE CURRENT REGISTRATION SHOULD BE ON BOARD. I WAS TOLD YOU HAVE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME TO REPLACE THE OLD WITH THE NEW. I AM UNSURE IF THIS IS TRUE AND RECOGNIZE MY RESPONSIBILITY AS A REQUIRED CREW MEMBER TO KNOW THIS INFO AND WILL FIND OUT. I RELIED ON THE PIC'S JUDGEMENT IN THIS MATTER. I DO RECOGNIZE MY RESPONSIBILITY TO KNOW ALL AVAILABLE INFO ABOUT A FLT IN WHICH I AM TO ACT AS A REQUIRED CREW MEMBER. I REGRET BEING PART OF A FLC (SIC) IF I HAVE VIOLATED ANY FARS.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.