TCASII. FLC FOLLOWED RA OF TCASII AND AVOIDED VFR TFC. ATC CTLR DIDN'T ALERT FLC TO TFC DUE TO OVERLOADED TFC IN SECTOR.
Synopsis
TCASII. FLC FOLLOWED RA OF TCASII AND AVOIDED VFR TFC. ATC CTLR DIDN'T ALERT FLC TO TFC DUE TO OVERLOADED TFC IN SECTOR.
Narrative
DSNDING INTO DTW; WE WERE GIVEN A CLRNC DIRECT TO MIZAR; CROSS AT 12000 FT. WE LEFT 20000 FT (DSND NOW TO 18000 FT; OUR DISCRETION TO CROSS MIZAR AT 12000 FT WAS THE CLRNC). AT ABOUT 18500 FT WE GOT A TCASII 'TFC' FOLLOWED BY 'CLB; CLB.' ABOUT THE SAME TIME THE TCASII WAS GOING OFF; THE CTLR CALLED TO ADVISE US OF THE TFC. WE CLBED BACK TO 18500 FT (TCASII ADVISED TO 'MONITOR VERT SPD' OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT; AND ATC TOLD US THAT TFC WAS LEVEL AT 17500 FT'). AFTER 'CLR OF CONFLICT' WE RESUMED DSCNT. AFTER WE LANDED; I CALLED THE NUMBER GIVEN TO ME AND SPOKE WITH ACTING SUPVR OF CLE AREA #1 AND WE DISCUSSED THE SIT. WE DECIDED THAT AS THINGS GET BUSY FOR THEM; THEY GET OVERLOADED; AND LESS SIGNIFICANT THINGS BECOME OVERLOOKED (IF SOMETHING GETS 'DUMPED' IT STARTS WITH THE LEAST SIGNIFICANT). EVIDENTLY; VFR TFC SHOWS UP DIFFERENTLY ON THEIR DISPLAY BECAUSE IT IS LESS SIGNIFICANT. MY FEELING IS; THAT IF THEY GET SO OVERLOADED THAT THEY MISS A POSSIBLE MIDAIR; THE SYS IS TRYING TO DO TOO MUCH WITH TOO LITTLE; IE; STOP PUTTING SO MANY IFR ACFT IN ONE SECTOR AT A TIME. SHE WAS OVERLOADED WITH IFR ACFT AND HAD TO OVERLOOK (DUMP) THE SCAN ON THE VFR GUYS.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.