AN SMA PLT RPTS THAT HE WAS CONFRONTED BY AN SMT PLT THAT HAD TO TAKE EVASIVE ACTION GAR WHEN THE RPTR LANDED IN FRONT OF THE SMT AT AN UNCTLED ARPT UNICOM. IMPROPER TFC PATTERN PROC BY SMT.

Narrative

AS I ENTERED THE TFC PATTERN AT IZA ON A L XWIND ENTRY OVER THE DEP END OF RWY 26 AT 1800 FT MSL AND RPTED THAT POS OVER THE UNICOM FREQ; I HEARD AN AEROSTAR RPT A 5 MI STRAIGHT-IN FROM THE 'DAM.' I PROCEEDED INTO A TIGHT L DOWNWIND LEG BEHIND A C150. I TURNED L BASE OVER ROAD (1/4 MI OR LESS) AND HEARD AEROSTAR CALL 2 1/2 MI FINAL AND SAW HIM BEYOND THE HWY. I COULD NOT SEE HIS LNDG GEAR OUT BUT LNDG LIGHTS WERE ON. I PROCEEDED TO LAND AND TURN OFF THE RWY AND THEN SAW AEROSTAR GOING AROUND. THE UNICOM OPERATOR ADVISED THE 'ACFT ON STRAIGHT-IN AT IZA.' THAT IZA USES L TFC FOR RWY 26 ON WKENDS. THIS CALL WAS MADE JUST BEFORE I TURNED BASE. AFTER AEROSTAR LANDED AND UNLOADED HIS PAX (I WAS TOLD THAT AEROSTAR WAS BEING OPERATED AS A PART 135 CARRIER) THE PLT CAME TO MY ACFT AND CONFRONTED ME AND CLAIMED THAT I CUT HIM OUT OF THE PATTERN; AS HE CLAIMED THAT CALLING A 5 MI AND 2 1/2 MI FINAL; STRAIGHT-IN; GAVE HIM PRIORITY FOR THE RWY. I EXPLAINED THAT I FELT THAT HE WAS 'CUTTING CORNERS' AND OPERATING UNSAFELY BY DOING A VERY FAST; LONG; STRAIGHT- IN APCH TO AN UNCTLED FIELD ON A BUSY WKEND. I SUGGESTED THAT AN OVERHEAD APCH (UPWIND) TO THE TFC PATTERN WOULD BE A SAFER APCH. HE DID NOT AGREE. I SUGGEST THAT THE FAA PUBLISH AND PROVIDE TO UNCTLED ARPTS A WRITTEN PROC THAT MAY BE POSTED FOR PLTS TO SEE; STATING THE PROPER TFC PATTERN ENTRIES THAT MAY BE USED.