DC10-30 ACFT. CAPT RPTR FAILED TO SEE #2 WINDOW NOT CLOSED COMPLETELY ON PREFLT. ON TKOF ROLL NOTICED IT AND REJECTED THE TKOF.
Synopsis
DC10-30 ACFT. CAPT RPTR FAILED TO SEE #2 WINDOW NOT CLOSED COMPLETELY ON PREFLT. ON TKOF ROLL NOTICED IT AND REJECTED THE TKOF.
Narrative
WE COMPLETED OUR PREFLT AND TAXI DUTIES AND WERE CLRED ONTO RWY 21C. METRO TWR CLRED US FOR TKOF. I ADVANCED THE THRUST LEVERS AND IMMEDIATELY BECAME AWARE THAT MY #2 WINDOW WAS NOT FULLY CLOSED. I RETARDED THE THRUST LEVERS AND CLRED THE RWY; SECURED THE WINDOW AND COMPLETED THE TRIP WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. THE NEXT OBVIOUS QUESTION IS HOW DID I MISS THIS DURING PREFLT? A COUPLE OF THINGS COME TO MIND. I DO REMEMBER LOOKING AT THE WINDOW DURING MY PREFLT FLOW AND NOTING THAT THE WINDOW LOOKED CLOSED; BUT; WHAT I WAS LOOKING AT WAS THE WINDOW FRAME. IT LOOKED CLOSED. WHAT I SHOULD HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT WAS THE OVER-CTR LOCK. OUR COMPANY FLIES 2 VERSIONS OF THE DC10 A -30 AND -40 MODEL. I GENERALLY FLY THE -40 MODEL. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES IN THE COCKPIT LAYOUTS AND PREFLT PROCS BTWN THE 2 MODELS. THE INS ON THE -30 IS SIGNIFICANTLY MORE COMPLICATED THAN THE -40 AND TAKES MORE TIME TO PROGRAM. BECAUSE OF MY LACK OF EXPERIENCE ON THE -30 THERE IS MORE PRESSURE TO ACCOMPLISH THE PREFLT WITHIN THE ALLOWED OR SHOULD I SAY ALLOTTED TIME. I CAN SAY I WAS A LITTLE RUSHED TO ACCOMPLISH MY TASKS. ANOTHER CONTRIBUTING FACTOR IS THAT THE WINDOW FRAME ON THE 2 MODELS IS DIFFERENT. WHEN I LOOKED AT THE -30 FRAME AGAIN IT STILL LOOKED CLOSED. I TRIED THE SAME THING WITH A -40 AND IT LOOKED OPEN. ANOTHER FACTOR; FATIGUE. I HAD A POOR NIGHT'S SLEEP THE NIGHT BEFORE AND I FEEL THAT MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE PROB. I DON'T THINK THIS WILL EVER HAPPEN AGAIN TO ME BECAUSE ON ALL FUTURE PREFLTS I WILL GO THROUGH THE MOTIONS OF OPENING AND SECURING THE WINDOW MYSELF.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.