A B767 PRIOR TO DEP HAD AN FAA MAINT INSPECTOR QUESTION NO LOG ENTRY FOR CIRCUIT BREAKERS THAT WERE COLLARED FOR SYS NOT INSTALLED OR REMOVED FROM THE ACFT.
Synopsis
A B767 PRIOR TO DEP HAD AN FAA MAINT INSPECTOR QUESTION NO LOG ENTRY FOR CIRCUIT BREAKERS THAT WERE COLLARED FOR SYS NOT INSTALLED OR REMOVED FROM THE ACFT.
Narrative
AT 15 MINS PRIOR TO DEP; FAA JUMP SEATER (WHO IS A LINE MAINT INSPECTOR) BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT 3 CIRCUIT BREAKERS WHICH WERE PULLED AND COLLARED. THESE WERE THE RAIN REPELLENT CIRCUIT BREAKER; THE PACK FLOW CIRCUIT BREAKER; PANEL 11-3; CIRCUIT BREAKER N17; AND THE ADF CIRCUIT BREAKER PANEL 11-4 CIRCUIT BREAKER F-27. HE WAS WORRIED THAT THE INOP PLACARDS MIGHT CONFUSE SOMEONE THAT THE EQUIP WAS BROKEN AND SHOULD BE SHOWN IN THE LOGBOOK AS A DEFERRED ITEM. I ASSURED HIM THAT THE EQUIP WAS NOT INSTALLED ON THE ACFT. I SATISFIED HIM ON THE RAIN REPELLENT SINCE THERE IS AN SEL ENTRY FOR THAT ITEM ON MY FLT PLAN. I TOLD HIM THAT THE OTHER 2 WERE CONFIGN ITEMS FROM THE BOEING PRODUCTION LINE AND THAT THEY NEVER HAD BEEN INSTALLED; EVEN THOUGH THE ADF CTL HEAD AND THE CIRCUIT BREAKERS WERE IN EVIDENCE. I DECLINED TO DELAY THE FLT IN ORDER TO LET HIM CONFER WITH THE MAINT HIGHER- UPS AT ACR AND HE STERNLY REMARKED THAT IF I FELT COMFORTABLE TAKING THE ACFT IN THIS CONDITION; THEN WE COULD GO. I ASSURED HIM AS TO THAT AND WE DEPARTED ON TIME. THIS IS A HEADS UP TO MAINT.
More incidents for this aircraft family →
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.