AN ACR FK10 FLC RECEIVED A CLRNC 'AS FILED;' BUT AS THEY INTERCEPTED THEIR OUTBOUND RADIAL THE DEP CTLR TOLD THEM THAT THEY WERE ON THE WRONG TRANSITION. APPARENTLY; THEIR NEW ROUTING; MEANT TO AVOID TSTMS; WAS NOT RECEIVED BY ATC.
Synopsis
AN ACR FK10 FLC RECEIVED A CLRNC 'AS FILED;' BUT AS THEY INTERCEPTED THEIR OUTBOUND RADIAL THE DEP CTLR TOLD THEM THAT THEY WERE ON THE WRONG TRANSITION. APPARENTLY; THEIR NEW ROUTING; MEANT TO AVOID TSTMS; WAS NOT RECEIVED BY ATC.
Narrative
PDC UNAVAILABLE. RECEIVED AND READ BACK CLRNC WITH CLRNC DELIVERY AS CLRED AS FILED; ETC. CLRNC DELIVERY GAVE US A READBACK CORRECT. THE FLT PLAN CALLED FOR THE TEX3; OKM TRANSITION WHICH IS THE 012 DEG RADIAL OUT OF RANGER. TRACKING OUT OF THE FUZ/012 DEG RADIAL DEP ASKED US TO TURN AND INTERCEPT THE FUZ/360 DEG RADIAL AS PER OUR CLRNC. THEY EXPECTED US TO FLY THE TEX3; TUL TRANSITION. THE TEX3; OKM TRANSITION IS NOT USUALLY FLOWN; BUT THAT CLRNC MADE SENSE DUE TO THE WX ON THE TEX3; TUL AND TEX3; IRW ROUTING. I DO NOT KNOW WHY THE CONFUSION WITH THE CLRNC. IF I READ BACK THE INCORRECT CLRNC; CLRNC DELIVERY SHOULD HAVE ADVISED ME SO. NO TFC CONFLICT OCCURRED; AND WE ENDED UP DEVIATING TO THE E OF THE FUZ/360 DEG RADIAL FOR WX AVOIDANCE AFTER WE TURNED FROM THE FUZ/012 DEG RADIAL AND INTERCEPTED THE FUZ/360 DEG RADIAL. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 383520: THE ZFW CTLR AGREED THAT WAS A GOOD IDEA; BUT DID NOT HAVE THAT FLT PLAN OR CLRNC FOR US; ANYWAY. WE WERE RECLRED DIRECT AND DEVIATED AROUND THE WX TO THE E WITHOUT FURTHER CONFUSION. THIS HAS HAPPENED OCCASIONALLY BEFORE WHEN A GOOD DISPATCHER RE-FILES TO AVOID OBVIOUS WX; IT SOMETIMES DOES NOT GET IN THE SYS IN TIME FOR ATC TO GET THE RE-RTE OR UPDATE.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.