F100 PIC INADVERTENTLY SHUTS DOWN R ENG WITH FUEL START LEVER. FO; PF; HAD ASKED FOR 'FLAPS 42 DEGS' DURING A TURN ONTO A SHORT VISUAL APCH. CAPT SELECTED THE FUEL START LEVER TO THE 'SHUTOFF' POS INSTEAD AND THE ENG WOUND DOWN. ENG WAS IN A RESTARTED CONFIGN BY TOUCHDOWN. FO NOTED THAT PIC WAS UNDER EMOTIONAL STRESS.
Synopsis
F100 PIC INADVERTENTLY SHUTS DOWN R ENG WITH FUEL START LEVER. FO; PF; HAD ASKED FOR 'FLAPS 42 DEGS' DURING A TURN ONTO A SHORT VISUAL APCH. CAPT SELECTED THE FUEL START LEVER TO THE 'SHUTOFF' POS INSTEAD AND THE ENG WOUND DOWN. ENG WAS IN A RESTARTED CONFIGN BY TOUCHDOWN. FO NOTED THAT PIC WAS UNDER EMOTIONAL STRESS.
Narrative
WHILE ENRTE TO MSP THE CAPT DISCUSSED THE MANY PERSONAL PROBS HE WAS HAVING. HIS PERFORMANCE IN THE COCKPIT APPEARED TO BE NORMAL DESPITE HIS MANY DISTRS. WHILE CONDUCTING A VISUAL APCH; I WAS FLYING THE AIRPLANE. AT 1000 FT AGL I CALLED FOR FLAPS 42 DEGS. THE FLAP INDICATION DID NOT CHANGE SO I REPEATED 'FLAPS 42 DEGS.' THE CAPT RESPONDED WITH 'OH; SORRY' AND SELECTED 42 DEGS OF FLAPS. I NOTICED THAT MY EFIS DISPLAY BLINKED AND BEGAN TO INVESTIGATE. AT THIS TIME I NOTICED THAT THE R ENG HAD BEEN SHUT DOWN. THE CAPT HAD SHUT THE R FUEL LEVER INSTEAD OF MOVING THE FLAP HANDLE. I BROUGHT THIS TO HIS ATTN; WHEREUPON THE CAPT BEGAN TRYING TO RESTART THE ENG. I REALIZED AT THIS TIME I WAS IN A SINGLE PLT SIT. I INCREASED THRUST TO THE L ENG. THE AIRSPD IMMEDIATELY INCREASED TO REF PLUS 20 KTS; SO I KNEW THAT I COULD LEAVE THE FLAPS AT 42 DEGS. I BLED THE EXCESS SPD OFF; MADE SURE ALL LNDG CHKLIST ITEMS HAD BEEN COMPLETED; AND EXECUTED A NORMAL LNDG. THE CAPT HAD THE ENG RUNNING BY TOUCHDOWN; BOTH THRUST REVERSERS WERE DEPLOYED; FOLLOWED BY A NORMAL ROLLOUT. THE CAPT WAS VISIBLY UPSET THAT HE HAD DONE THIS; BUT WAS ABLE TO TAXI TO THE GATE WITHOUT INCIDENT. I BELIEVE THE CAUSE OF THIS INCIDENT WAS THE CAPT'S PREOCCUPATION WITH HIS PERSONAL PROBS AND A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR IS THE CLOSE PROX OF THE FUEL SHUTOFF LEVER TO THE FLAP LEVER WHILE AT THE 25 DEGS FLAPS SETTING. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATED THAT THE CAPT PROBABLY WAS HIGHLY DISTR WITH HIS PROBS. ALTHOUGH HE HAD 'NOT RAMBLED ON' BELOW 10000 FT; HE HAD MADE A SHORT REF TO HIS AFOREMENTIONED PROBS; SO HIS THINKING WAS NOT ALL THAT CLR. THE CHIEF PLT DID NOT THINK THAT THIS WAS A DESIGN PROB. THE FO BELIEVES IT WAS STRICTLY A PLT PROB. THE FO ALSO FILLED OUT AN 'INTERNAL AIR SAFETY RPT' FOR THE COMPANY TO REVIEW.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.