A B767-300 WAS DISPATCHED AFTER HVY MAINT WAS PERFORMED WITH A CARGO COMPARTMENT CEILING PANEL IMPROPERLY REPAIRED.

Date: 1997-12 · Aircraft: B767-300 and 300 ER

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-less-severe|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|other-unspecified

Synopsis

A B767-300 WAS DISPATCHED AFTER HVY MAINT WAS PERFORMED WITH A CARGO COMPARTMENT CEILING PANEL IMPROPERLY REPAIRED.

Narrative

ON THE NIGHT OF DEC/XX/97 I WAS PART OF A GROUP OF MECHS ASSIGNED TO PERFORM A LAYOVER INSPECTION ON ACFT YYY; A B767-ER THAT ACR PURCHASED FROM XYZ. THIS ACFT WAS FLOWN UP FROM THE MAINT FACILITY; XXX; WHERE IT HAD UNDERGONE EXTENSIVE MODIFICATIONS. THIS BEING THE CASE; I PERFORMED ONLY A CURSORY INSPECTION OF THE CARGO COMPARTMENT FOR CONDITION AND SECURITY; AS I BELIEVED THE CARGO COMPARTMENT HAD BEEN INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS NECESSARY AS PART OF ITS PRESVC CHKS WHILE AT XXX. BECAUSE I DID NOT SEE ANY 'BIG PIECES' MISSING; I BELIEVED THE CARGO COMPARTMENT WAS OK FOR SVC. UPON INSPECTION; THE FAA INSPECTOR FOUND SOME OF THE JOINT SEALING TAPE WAS LOOSE; AND A COMPARTMENT LIGHT TRIM RING WAS FOUND TO BE UNSECURED; CAUSING THE CEILING PANEL TO SAG. THE UNSECURED TRIM RING AND THE LOOSE TAPE WERE PROBABLY A RESULT OF BEING REMOVED WHILE AT XXX; AND NOT BEING PROPERLY DOCUMENTED; THEY WERE NEVER REINSTALLED. SEVERAL OTHER MECHANICS HAD BEEN IN THE CARGO COMPARTMENTS AT ONE POINT OR ANOTHER; AND NONE HAD NOTED THE DEFECTS; HOWEVER; NONE OF US EXPECTED TO FIND PROBS LIKE THIS FROM AN ACFT THAT HAD JUST UNDERGONE MAJOR MAINT AND HAD NOT YET BEEN PUT BACK INTO SVC.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.