RPT OF A POSSIBLE LOSS OF SEPARATION BTWN A C172 ON LNDG ROLLOUT ON RWY 24 AND A COMMERCIAL JET FOR RWY 19.

Date: 1998-04 · Aircraft: Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172

Anomalies: conflict-ground-conflict|less-severe|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy

Synopsis

RPT OF A POSSIBLE LOSS OF SEPARATION BTWN A C172 ON LNDG ROLLOUT ON RWY 24 AND A COMMERCIAL JET FOR RWY 19.

Narrative

I WAS FLYING WITH A FRIEND. WHEN I WAS CLRED TO LAND ON RWY 24; I LANDED. AT TEB THERE IS ALSO A RWY THAT RUNS THROUGH RWY 24 WHICH IS RWY 19. WHEN I LANDED ON RWY 24; AND WAS GOING TO CROSS RWY 19; I SAW A HUGE JET LNDG ON RWY 19. AT THAT POINT THE COMMERCIAL PLT BRAKED TO AVOID RWY 19 AND GETTING HIT BY THE OTHER ACFT. THEN MADE U- TURN TO STAY CLR OF RWY 19. THE ONLY REASON HE DID THIS WAS [END OF RPT]. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: ANALYST WAS TOLD BY THE RPTR THAT HE WAS THE PF AND THAT THEY WERE TOLD ON LNDG ROLLOUT NOT TO STOP AND NOT TO DELAY THROUGH RWY 19. RPTR STATED HIS COMPANION; A COMMERCIAL RATED PLT; SAW THE ARR JET AND BRAKED AND TURNED THE ACFT SHORT OF THE RWY 19 HOLD LINE. RPTR INDICATED THAT WHEN THEY CALLED THE TWR AFTER PARKING THEY LEARNED THE LCL CTLR EXPECTED THE ACFT TO GO THROUGH THE INTXN AND BE CLR FOR THE LNDG JET BUT WHEN THE CESSNA STOPPED; THE JET WAS SENT AROUND AS THE CTLR DID NOT KNOW IF RPTR'S ACFT WOULD GO INTO THE INTXN. RPTR INDICATED THERE WAS NO LOSS OF SEPARATION. RPTR INDICATED THE JET WAS AN ACR BUT DID NOT KNOW THE TYPE.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.