FLC OF AN AIRBUS A300 COMPLAINED ABOUT A BREACH OF ARPT SECURITY AT A FOREIGN ARPT BECAUSE THEIR BAGGAGE HAD BEEN TAKEN OFF THE ARPT ON CREW BUS AND THEN RETURNED 1 HR LATER SHOWING SIGNS OF BEING OPENED AND PUT IN ANOTHER LOCATION IN THE BUS. AN FAA ACR INSPECTOR OF A REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS OFFICE WAS A WITNESS TO THIS ENTIRE INCIDENT.

Narrative

ALL OF THE FOLLOWING EVENTS OCCURRED IN THE PRESENCE OF AND WITH THE FULL KNOWLEDGE OF AN FAA ACR INSPECTOR; NEW YORK REGIONAL OFFICE. UPON ARR AT LHR OPS; THE FO AND I EXITED THE BUS AND WENT TO THE BACK OF THE BUS TO RETRIEVE OUR BAGGAGE AND KIT BAGS. THE BUS DRIVER INSISTED THAT WE LEAVE THE BAGS ON THE BUS AS HE WOULD RETURN TO PICK US UP AFTER HE DROPPED OFF OUR FLT ATTENDANTS. WE LEFT OUR BAGS ON THE BUS. AFTER ABOUT 20 MINS OF WAITING FOR HIM TO RETURN; WE WERE INFORMED THAT HE LEFT THE ARPT WITH OUR BAGS -- BAGS WHICH HAD BEEN ALREADY SCREENED BY SECURITY. HE THEN RE-ENTERED THE ARPT; APPROX 1 HR LATER WITH OUR BAGS NOW IN VIOLATION OF CLR SECURITY MEASURES. THE BAGS HAD BEEN OPENED; AND WERE NOT WHERE WE LEFT THEM IN THE BUS. THE FO AND I FINALLY REBOARDED THE BUS WHEN IT RETURNED; AND INSPECTED OUR BAGS -- COMPLETELY TEARING THEM APART TO MAKE SURE THAT NOTHING HAD BEEN PUT IN THEM; OR HAD BEEN TAKEN FROM THEM. THE DRIVER WAS COMPLETELY ALOOF; DISINTERESTED; AND NOT AT ALL APOLOGETIC THAT HE HAD DELAYED OUR FLT ALMOST 1 HR. SINCE THIS CONSTITUTED A CLR BREACH OF SECURITY; I AM COMPELLED TO DEBRIEF IT. HOWEVER; IF THE USUAL PRACTICE OF IGNORING DEBRIEFS IS FOLLOWED; I FULLY EXPECT THAT I WILL RECEIVE NO RESPONSE OR REASONABLE EXCUSE WHY THIS IS ALLOWED TO HAPPEN. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATED THAT THE CREW BUS DRIVER WAS A CONTRACT BUS DRIVER OF THIRD WORLD ORIGIN. THE DRIVER NORMALLY DROPS THE FLC OFF AT OPS; THEN TAKES THE CABIN ATTENDANTS OVER TO THE ACFT; COMING BACK FOR THE COCKPIT CREW WHEN THEY ARE READY TO GO TO THE ACFT. THE BUS NORMALLY DOES NOT LEAVE THE AREA. IN THIS INSTANCE THE DRIVER HAD RECEIVED A CALL FROM HIS DISPATCHER WHILE AT THE ACFT WITH THE FLT ATTENDANTS AND LEFT THE ARPT; FORGETTING ABOUT THE CREW BAGS ON BOARD. THE CAPT SAID THAT THE BAGS WERE ORIGINALLY PLACED IN THE SIDE OR REAR BAGGAGE COMPARTMENT BUT WHEN THE BUS FINALLY RETURNED OVER 1 HR LATER; THE BAGS WERE SITTING ON THE FRONT PAX SEATS. THE ZIPPER OF THE CAPT'S BAG WAS OPEN. WHEN THE CAPT ATTEMPTED TO GET ANSWERS TO THIS PROB THE DRIVER JUST SAID; 'I DON'T KNOW;' ALTHOUGH HE HAD ADMITTED THAT HE HAD BROUGHT THE BAGS UP FROM THE BAGGAGE COMPARTMENT. WHEN ASKED IF HE NORMALLY LEFT HIS BAGS ON BOARD; THE CAPT SAID NO; BUT DIDN'T SEE A PROB WHEN THE DRIVER SUGGESTED HE LEAVE THEM WITH HIM. THE CAPT CARRIES HIS COMMERCIAL CHART MATERIAL IN A SHOULDER BAG SO HE DIDN'T NEED HIS FLT KIT. THE NEW YORK BASED ACI AT FIRST LAUGHED OVER THIS; AT FIRST SAYING THE SIT WAS RIDICULOUS; BUT THEN STATED THAT HE WOULD 'DO SOMETHING' ABOUT IT. THE SECURITY POINT IS NEAR THE ENTRANCE TO LHR AND IS A TUNNEL LIKE AREA THAT CHKS THE CONTENTS OF CREW BUSES; CATERING VEHICLES AND THE LIKE. NOT PAX VEHICLES. THE RPTR WOULD LIKE TO SEE A POLICY CREATED OR STATED THAT WOULD PROHIBIT FLCS FROM LEAVING THEIR BAGS IN THE COMPANY OF ANYONE ELSE. THE ACR POLICY MANUAL DOES NOT CONTAIN THIS RESTRICTIVE MESSAGE. SO FAR AS HE KNOWS; THE COMPANY IS NOT DOING ANYTHING ABOUT THIS SECURITY BREACH. HE SAID THE IMPLICATIONS OR POTENTIAL FOR BREACHING SECURITY CAN BE VERY SERIOUS.