NMAC. FLC OF A B737-300 SLOWED TO AVOID ANOTHER B737 OVERSHOOTING FINAL TO THE OTHER PARALLEL RWY DURING A VISUAL APCH. APCH CTLR ISSUED ADVISORY OF THE OTHER ACFT TURNING FINAL TO THE OTHER PARALLEL RWY BUT DID NOT EXPECT HIS OVERSHOOT.

Date: 1998-11 · Aircraft: B737-300 · Phase: approach

Anomalies: conflict-nmac|other-unspecified

Synopsis

NMAC. FLC OF A B737-300 SLOWED TO AVOID ANOTHER B737 OVERSHOOTING FINAL TO THE OTHER PARALLEL RWY DURING A VISUAL APCH. APCH CTLR ISSUED ADVISORY OF THE OTHER ACFT TURNING FINAL TO THE OTHER PARALLEL RWY BUT DID NOT EXPECT HIS OVERSHOOT.

Narrative

WE HAD BEEN CLRED TO DIRECT CIVET INTXN BY ZLA FROM NEAR GOLFS INTXN. THE FMC WAS SET UP FOR A CIVET ARR WITH A TRANSITION TO THE ILS RWY 24R. PRIOR TO CIVET; WE WERE SLOWED TO 250 KTS. UPON CONTACT WITH SOCAL APCH; WE WERE RECLRED THE MITTS ARR FOR THE ILS RWY 24R. WE WERE STEPPED DOWN IN ALT FOR THE ARR RATHER THAN CLRED FOR THE PROFILE DUE TO THE PROX OF A B727 TO OUR L FOR THE ILS RWY 25L. WHEN CLRED FOR THE VISUAL TO RWY 24R; WE WERE SLOWED TO 210 KTS. AT APPROX MERCE INTXN; WE WERE TOLD TO SIDESTEP TO RWY 24L FOR AN ACR Y B737 ON A BASE LEG FOR RWY 24R. WE SAW AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE TFC AND LINED UP FOR RWY 24L ON THE LOC. APCH OR TWR (I DO NOT REMEMBER AS I WAS FLYING THE ACFT AND INTENSELY FOCUSED ON THE ENCROACHING ACFT) TOLD US TO SLOW TO 170 KTS TO THE MARKER AND NOT TO PASS ACR Y. UNFORTUNATELY; THE B737 GROSSLY OVERSHOT THEIR TURN ONTO RWY 24R LOC AND PASSED THROUGH THE FINAL FOR RWY 24L IN FRONT OF US. TO AVOID COLLISION; THE LNDG GEAR WAS LOWERED; FLAPS EXTENDED BEYOND COMPANY SPDS (BUT LESS THAN STRUCTURAL); AND SPD BRAKES EXTENDED. I MAINTAINED A POS BELOW AND TO THE L OF THE ACFT. I COULD NOT KEEP FROM PASSING THEM ON THE L. WE HAD LOST SIGHT OF THE B727 AND WERE RELUCTANT TO DEVIATE TO THE L. I WAS GLAD FOR MY FORMATION AND AERIAL REFUELING EXPERIENCE. THE QUESTION THAT BEGGED FOR OUR ANSWER IS; WHY -- WHEN WE WERE STABILIZED ON THE APCH -- WE WERE SIDESTEPPED TO THE ADJACENT RWY? GRANTED; WE HAD ACCEPTED RESPONSIBILITY FOR VISUAL SEPARATION; THE POOR CAPTURE TECHNIQUE OF THE OTHER CREW SEVERELY COMPROMISED SAFETY FOR ALL. THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION WOULD HAVE BEEN TO VECTOR ACR Y BEHIND US TO FOLLOW; OR TO CROSS BEHIND FOR RWY 24L. ALSO; RETRAINING OF THE OTHER CREW CONCERNING TURN-ON AND CAPTURE TECHNIQUES MIGHT BE IN ORDER. EXTRAORDINARY EVASIVE MANEUVERS WITH TERRAIN WITHIN 3000 FT WITH A LARGER ACFT TO OUR L ARE TOO FUN ON THE FIRST LEG OF THE DAY.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.