E120 PIC CONCERNED WITH COMPANY PROCS FOR FUEL LOADS VERSUS PAX WT PAYLOADS.
Synopsis
E120 PIC CONCERNED WITH COMPANY PROCS FOR FUEL LOADS VERSUS PAX WT PAYLOADS.
Narrative
I WAS PIC ON A SCHEDULED PART 121 PAX FLT FROM MCO-EYW. THE EMB120 WE OPERATE ON THIS RTE BECOMES WT RESTR AS A FUNCTION OF THE ZERO FUEL WT LIMITATION. THIS IS TO SAY THAT ANY ADDITIONAL FUEL TRANSLATES INTO LESS PAYLOAD. THE AMOUNT OF FUEL DERIVED BY COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZFW RESTR IS 2205 LBS. THIS IS ENOUGH TO FLY TO EYW; CARRY 45 MIN IFR RESERVE AND 15-20 MINS CONTINGENCY. EYW HAS ONE 4800 FT RWY WITH NO PRECISION APCHS; AND THE ONLY STRAIGHT-IN APCHS ARE ASR'S. SEVERAL TIMES THIS ARPT HAS CLOSED DUE TO DISABLED ACFT. A NAVY BASE IS LOCATED ABOUT 5 MI AWAY FROM EYW. THE NAVY BASE PROVIDES A SITE FOR AN EMER LNDG. THE NEXT LNDG SITE IS ABOUT 20 MI AWAY; MTH. MTH IS NOT AN APPROVED ALTERNATE. MIA AND RSW/APF ARE ALTERNATES. THESE ARPTS ARE ABOUT 45 MINS AWAY. AS I REVIEWED THE WX PACKAGE WHICH ACCOMPANIED MY DISPATCH RELEASE I NOTED THAT LEGALLY; AN ALTERNATE WAS NOT REQUIRED AND WAS NOT LISTED. I ELECTED TO CARRY ENOUGH FUEL TO BE ABLE TO DIVERT FROM EYW TO A SUITABLE ALTERNATE WITHOUT USING MY 45 MINS IFR RESERVE. I DO NOT CONSIDER THE NAVY BASE A SUITABLE ALTERNATE FOR A DIVERSION DUE TO WX. AT MCO I INFORMED THE STATION THAT I NEEDED ADDITIONAL FUEL. WE COMPLETED THE FLT WITHOUT ANY WX PROBS. HOWEVER; WE ALMOST HAD TO START HOLDING BECAUSE THE EYW RADAR WAS DOWN AND THEY WERE USING NON RADAR PROCS. I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE LOGIC USED TO DISPATCH OUR ACFT: 1) ALL ACFT DISPATCHED TO EYW SHOULD HAVE ENOUGH FUEL TO SUCCESSFULLY DIVERT WITHOUT BURNING THE 45 MIN RESERVE. 2) DISPATCHERS SHOULD LOOK AT THE ACTUAL WX AND COMPARE IT TO THE FORECAST. OUR OPS FOR DISPATCHING DO NOT REQUIRE THAT ACTUAL CONDITIONS BE CONSIDERED. 3) DISPATCHERS SHOULD BE TRAINED TO UNDERSTAND THAT SAFETY IS THEIR FIRST PRIORITY. MANY TIMES I HAVE HAD A DISPATCHER IMMEDIATELY START TALKING ABOUT PAYLOAD AND BUMPING PAX. BASED ON THE NUMBER OF TIMES I HAVE HEARD THIS; I HAVE A DISTINCT IMPRESSION THAT OUR DISPATCHERS ARE UNDER PRESSURE TO SKIMP ON FUEL IF IT MIGHT CAUSE PAX TO BE BUMPED. 4) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVING MTH AS AN ALTERNATE.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.