A BOEING 737-700 FLC FLEW THE WRONG DEP HEADING FROM CLT.

Date: 1999-10 · Aircraft: B737-200 · Phase: initial_climb

Anomalies: deviation-track-heading-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy

Synopsis

A BOEING 737-700 FLC FLEW THE WRONG DEP HEADING FROM CLT.

Narrative

DEPARTING CLT; FO LEG; WE EXPECTED TO DEPART RWY 36L. RWY DATA WAS PRINTED FOR RWY 36L; WE BRIEFED THE PANTHER 5 DEP USING RWY 35L. WHEN WE PUSHED OFF OF THE GATE WE WERE INFORMED WE WOULD BE DEPARTING RWY 36R. THERE WAS NOT MUCH GND TFC SO THE TAXI WAS SHORT. WE DIDN'T HAVE RADIO CONTACT WITH OUR STATION PEOPLE IN CLT SO I HAD TO REPROGRAM THE FMC AND FIGURE OUT NEW TKOF DATA FOR RWY 36R. I FAILED TO RE-BRIEF THE DEP AND STILL HAD THE MODE CTLR SET-UP FOR A TURN TO 330 DEGS FOR RWY 36L INSTEAD OF 025 DEGS FOR RWY 36R. I DEPARTED RWY 36R TURNED TO A HEADING OF 330 DEGS. WHEN THE CAPT CONTACTED DEP HE INFORMED US OUR HEADING SHOULD BE 25 DEGS. WE TURNED R AND HE GAVE US A HEADING TO INTERCEPT THE 076 DEG RADIAL TO MERIL INTXN. THE B737-700 WITH ITS AUTOMATIC UPLINK FEATURE CAN BE FRUSTRATING IN SITS LIKE THIS BECAUSE WHEN YOU RECEIVE A CHANGE ON TAXI IT TAKES A WHILE TO REPROGRAM EVERYTHING. NO COM WITH THE STATION WOULD HAVE TAKEN SOME OF THE WORKLOAD OFF OF THE COCKPIT CREW BUT THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING A NEW RADIO INSTALLED. THE CHAIN OF EVENTS STARTED WITH THE DEP NOT BEING RE-BRIEFED. I AM BEGINNING TO THINK THE AUTOMATIC (FMS AUTO UPDATE) CAN BE MORE OF A PROB THAN ITS WORTH. AS WE ALL KNOW IT WAS THE CLASSIC CHAIN OF EVENTS THAT NORMALLY DON'T HAPPEN THAT CAUSED A HIGHER COCKPIT WORKLOAD THAN NORMAL.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.