SEVERAL B737 MODELS 200; 300; AND 400 WERE RELEASED FOR SERVICE IN NON COMPLIANCE AFTER A RUDDER CONTROL MODIFICATION WITHOUT CATEGORY II AND AUTOLAND TESTS.

Date: 2000-05 · Aircraft: B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model · Phase: ground

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-critical|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-maintenance

Synopsis

SEVERAL B737 MODELS 200; 300; AND 400 WERE RELEASED FOR SERVICE IN NON COMPLIANCE AFTER A RUDDER CONTROL MODIFICATION WITHOUT CATEGORY II AND AUTOLAND TESTS.

Narrative

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

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.