E120 CREW HAD TRACK DEV IN ZLA CLASS E AIRSPACE.
Synopsis
E120 CREW HAD TRACK DEV IN ZLA CLASS E AIRSPACE.
Narrative
ON A FLT FROM PALM SPRINGS TO LAS VEGAS; WE DEVIATED FROM OUR CLRED ROUTING BY FLYING OUR FILED ROUTING. OUR CLRNC TOOK US FROM GOFFS VIA V538 TO THE LAS VOR. WE; HOWEVER; STAYED ON V514 FOR THE BOULDER CITY VOR AS WAS OUR FILED RTE. ZLA POINTED OUT THAT WE HAD BEEN CLRED VIA V538 AND GAVE US A VECTOR ON COURSE. THERE WAS NO TFC OR AIRSPACE CONFLICT. IN LOOKING AT THE EVENTS LEADING UP TO THIS POINT; IT IS EASY TO SEE HOW THIS SIT AROSE. FIRST; THE CREW HAD ONLY BEEN TOGETHER FOR A DAY. SECOND; THE FO WAS BRAND NEW. THIRD; AND MOST IMPORTANTLY; THE FO WAS CONFUSED AS TO THE DIFFERENCES BTWN FILED AND CLRED RTES. THE FO HAD A LIST OF 'CANNED' RTES. SOME OF THESE WERE APPARENTLY OUT-OF-DATE. THE ACTUAL FILED FLT PLAN IS ON THE DISPATCH RELEASE. THIS CONFUSION LED TO SOME MISCOM BTWN MYSELF AND THE FO. FOR CLARIFICATION; OUR COMPANY POLICY STATES THE PLT OBTAINING THE CLRNC WILL READ IT TO THE OTHER PLT DURING THE CHKLIST. APPARENTLY; I UNDERSTOOD 'CLRED AS FILED.' AS PIC; SHOULD HAVE MONITORED THE FO MORE CLOSELY. I SHOULD HAVE REALIZED THAT THE FO WAS UNSURE OF THE CLRNC RECEIVED AND ASKED CLRNC DELIVERY FOR CLARIFICATION.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.