A B737-300 HAD AN UNSERVICEABLE MAIN SHIPS BATTERY INSTALLED ACFT RETURNED TO THE GATE FOR CORRECT INSTALLATION.
Synopsis
A B737-300 HAD AN UNSERVICEABLE MAIN SHIPS BATTERY INSTALLED ACFT RETURNED TO THE GATE FOR CORRECT INSTALLATION.
Narrative
ON 09/WED/01; AT XA30 HRS I WAS NOTIFIED OF A LOW BATTERY VOLTAGE PROBLEM ON COMPANY ACFT YYY PARKED AT GATE; ZZZ INTERNATIONAL ARPT. I FOUND THE BATTERY CHARGER CIRCUIT BREAKER OPEN; WHICH CAUSED THE BATTERY TO DISCHARGE. I SUSPECT THE FLC BAG CAUGHT AND OPENED THE CIRCUIT BREAKER. I ORDERED A SERVICEABLE BATTERY FROM COMPANY STORES DEPT AND IT WAS DELIVERED TO THE ACFT FOR INSTALLATION. I INSTALLED THE BATTERY; PREFORMED AN OPERATIONAL CHECK ON THE BATTERY AND CHARGER SYSTEM ALL CHECKS WERE NORMAL WITH NO DEFECTS NOTED. I SIGNED THE LOGBOOK AND DISPATCHED THE ACFT. I RETURNED TO THE OFFICE TO ENTER THE MAINTENANCE AND PART INFO IN TO COMPANY COMPUTER SYSTEM. THE COMPUTER REJECTED THE PART INFO STATING THE PART WAS UNSERVICEABLE AND TO RE CHECK THE SERVICEABLE TAG. I DID THE RECHECK AND FOUND I WAS ISSUED A PART WHICH EXPIRED SHELF LIFE BY 5 DAYS. AT THAT POINT WE CONTACTED OPS AND WE TOLD THE ACFT HAD NOT TAKEN OF AND WOULD RETURN TO THE GATE. ANOTHER CREW REPLACED A SECOND ACFT BATTERY AND DISPATCHED THE ACFT. I SHOULD HAVE CHECKED THE SERVICEABLE TAG CLOSER PRIOR TO MY INSTALLATION WITH I WILL DO I THE FUTURE.
More incidents for this aircraft family →
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.