FLC OF AN MDT TURBO PROP OPERATED ACFT IN PAX SCHEDULED SVC WHEN ONE OF THE ENGS EXCEEDED ITT TEMP DURING START. HOWEVER; THE CAPT DID NOT TELL THE FO OF THE INCIDENT AND PROCEEDED TO FLY THE ACFT WHEN THE ENG NEEDED INSPECTION.
Synopsis
FLC OF AN MDT TURBO PROP OPERATED ACFT IN PAX SCHEDULED SVC WHEN ONE OF THE ENGS EXCEEDED ITT TEMP DURING START. HOWEVER; THE CAPT DID NOT TELL THE FO OF THE INCIDENT AND PROCEEDED TO FLY THE ACFT WHEN THE ENG NEEDED INSPECTION.
Narrative
ON NOV/SAT/2001 I WAS FO ON A PART 121 FLIGHT. AFTER THE PAX WERE LOADED I WAS HEADS DOWN CALCULATING THE LOAD MANIFESTS WHILE THE CAPT STARTED ENG #2. THIS IS NORMAL PRACTICE AS SPELLED OUT IN THE COMPANY PROCS AND THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR THE FO TO MONITOR THE ENG STARTS. UNKNOWN TO ME; THE GPU HAD FAILED DURING THE START SEQUENCE. WHILE STILL HEADS DOWN; I HEARD THE CAPT SAY SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT THAT; 'IT'S GOING TO GO HOT;' FOLLOWED QUICKLY BY; 'THERE IT IS.' HE ABORTED THE START SEQUENCE AND TOLD ME THAT THE GPU HAD FAILED. HE CALLED FOR A SECOND GPU WHILE I FINISHED THE WEIGHT AND BALANCE. WE GOT THE SECOND GPU; STARTED UP; AND TAXIED OFF THE GATE. WE FLEW THE ACFT IN FOUR SUBSEQUENT PART 121 REVENUE FLIGHTS THAT DAY. TEN DAYS LATER; I RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE COMPANY ASKING ME ABOUT THE HOT START. I TOLD OUR PROGRAM MGR THAT THE CAPT WAS 'ON TOP OF IT.' BY 'ON TOP OF IT' I MEANT THAT IT SOUNDED LIKE AFTER THE GPU FAILURE HE WAS ANTICIPATING THE HOT START; AND I BELIEVED HE HAD SHUT IT DOWN IN A TIMELY MANNER. THE PROGRAM MGR TOLD ME THAT WHEN THE CAPT SUBMITTED HIS WRITTEN INCIDENT REPORT; HE CLAIMED THAT DURING THE HOT START THE ITT EXCEEDED 950 DEGS C; A PWR PLANT LIMITATION. THUS; THE ACFT WAS NOT LEGAL FOR FURTHER PART 121 FLIGHTS UNTIL IT HAD BEEN INSPECTED BY MAINT. THIS WAS THE FIRST MOMENT THAT I BECAME AWARE THAT WE HAD EXCEEDED A LIMITATION. I HAVE FLOWN WITH THIS CAPT ON MANY OCCASIONS AND FOUND HIM TO BE VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE AND CONSCIENTIOUS OF THE REGULATIONS; ACFT SYS; AND COMPANY PROCS. I AM AT A LOSS TO EXPLAIN WHY THE CAPT DID NOT INFORM ME THAT THE ITT LIMITATION HAD BEEN EXCEEDED. WHAT CAN BE DONE TO PREVENT A RECURRENCE? REQUIRE THAT BOTH CREWMEMBERS MONITOR ENG STARTS. ALSO; IN THE EVENT OF A HOT START; HUNG START; OR OTHER ABNORMAL; REQUIRE THAT BOTH CREWMEMBERS DISCUSS ANY AND ALL APPLICABLE LIMITATIONS AND CONFIRM THAT NONE HAVE BEEN EXCEEDED.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.