A B737-300 FLC CORRECTS THEIR ACFT'S SUDDEN TURN OFF COURSE AFTER HAVING PROGRAMMED A SHORT RANGED 90 DEG INTERCEPT TO EMI; MD.

Date: 2002-01 · Aircraft: B737-300 · Phase: cruise

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-less-severe|deviation-track-heading-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance|other-fmc-limits

Synopsis

A B737-300 FLC CORRECTS THEIR ACFT'S SUDDEN TURN OFF COURSE AFTER HAVING PROGRAMMED A SHORT RANGED 90 DEG INTERCEPT TO EMI; MD.

Narrative

WHILE ENRTE ATC GAVE US NUMEROUS VECTORS FOR SPACING PURPOSES. FINALLY WE WERE CLRED DIRECT TO THE EMI VOR. BECAUSE WE WERE ONLY 9 MI FROM THE FIX AND HEADING 090 DEGS AWAY FROM THE VOR; THE FMC COMMANDED THE AUTOPLT INTO A STEEP R TURN TOWARDS THE FIX. JUST ABOUT THE TIME WE WERE ESTABLISHED DIRECT TO THE FIX; WE PASSED OVER THE VOR. AT THIS POINT WE BOTH NOTICED OUR CDI NEEDLES DEFLECT 3/4 TO THE L AND THE FMC COMMANDED THE AUTOPLT TO TURN L. THIS TYPE OF LARGE CDI DEFLECTION WHILE IN LNAV IS NOT NORMAL; SO WE KNEW THERE WAS SOME KIND OF PROB WITH THE FMC. WE CHKED THE FLT PLAN FOR THE PROPER OUTBOUND HEADING FROM EMI; AND SURE ENOUGH; THERE WAS A PROB. WE THEN SELECTED HEADING MODE ON OUR AUTOPLT AND BEGAN A TURN TO THE R; USING RAW VOR DATA TO HEAD TOWARDS THE OUTBOUND RADIAL FOR J48. JUST AT THIS POINT ATC ASKED WHAT HEADING WE WERE ON AND WE TOLD THEM OF OUR PROB AND WE WERE CORRECTING R. ATC THEN ASKED US TO CORRECT ANOTHER 20 DEGS R FOR THE INTERCEPT. LUCKILY THERE WAS NO CONFLICT WITH OTHER TFC AND ATC TOLD US THERE WAS NO PROB. AFTER REVIEWING OUR SIT IT WAS CLR TO US THAT THE FMC BECAME CONFUSED WHILE TRYING TO SORT OUT THE DIRECT EMI INPUTS; WHILE BEING SO CLOSE; AND SO EXTREME AN ANGLE TO THE FIX. FORTUNATELY; WE NOTICED THE PROB IN TIME TO TAKE ACTION BEFORE GETTING WAY OFF COURSE. IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT WHILE FMC AUTOMATION IS A GREAT TOOL FOR US PLTS; IT IS NOT PERFECT. WE ALWAYS HAVE TO BE READY TO GO TO MANUAL MODE WHEN THINGS GO WRONG. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 536574: ZDC WAS GIVING US SHARP RADAR VECTORS 'FOR ZTL SPACING.' AFTER SEVERAL TURNS WE WERE CLRED DIRECT EMI WHEN ONLY 10 MI FROM THE VOR AT AN ADVERSE ANGLE. I BELIEVE THE FMC BECAME CONFUSED DUE TO OUR CLOSE PROX TO THE VOR AND RADICAL GND TRACK CALLED FOR BY THE ATC CLRNC. I BELIEVE ATC SHOULD BE MORE CAUTIOUS WHEN CLRING FMC EQUIPPED ACFT TO A CLOSE PROX FIX INVOLVING RADICAL TURNS TO RE-ESTABLISH A FLT PLAN RTE. A BETTER SOLUTION WOULD HAVE BEEN TO ISSUE A RADAR VECTOR TO INTERCEPT THE AIRWAY DOWNSTREAM FROM THE SUBJECT FIX.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.