B737-300 CREW HAD A CONTINUOUS STICK SHAKER CAUSED BY A DAMAGED 'ROSEMONT ANGLE OF ATTACK PROBE.'

Date: 2002-03 · Aircraft: B737-300 · Phase: takeoff

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-critical|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|other-no-crew-walk-around-inspection-prior-to-departure

Synopsis

B737-300 CREW HAD A CONTINUOUS STICK SHAKER CAUSED BY A DAMAGED 'ROSEMONT ANGLE OF ATTACK PROBE.'

Narrative

AIR TURN-BACK FOR BENT ANGLE OF ATTACK PROBE/CONTINUOUS STICK SHAKER. THIS FLT WAS AN AIR TURN-BACK FOR CONTINUOUS CAPT'S STICK SHAKER FROM TKOF (AIR/GND LOGIC TO 'AIR' MODE) TO LNDG. IT STARTED AT MAIN WHEEL LIFTOFF. CAPT'S ANGLE OF ATTACK VANE WAS BADLY BENT PROBABLY CAUSED BY JETWAY ON ARR AT BWI. NO WALKAROUND -- CREW CHANGE IN BWI WAS CAPT (MYSELF) ONLY; FO DID NOT DO ANOTHER EXTERIOR INSPECTION. NO ONE MENTIONED ANYTHING ABOUT JETWAY MATING BEING ROUGH. RAINY NIGHT; SO GND CREW DIDN'T NOTICE BENT ANGLE OF ATTACK PROBE ON PUSHBACK. NO BIRDS SEEN NEAR AIRPLANE AT ANY TIME SO NO BIRD STRIKE. AFTER LNDG FROM THE TURN-BACK; MY FO MENTIONED THAT ON THEIR PREVIOUS ARR THE JETWAY HIT THE ACFT UNUSUALLY HARD AND 3 DISTINCT TIMES. ALSO HAD A SINGLE CHANNEL AUTO SLAT FAIL INDICATION. STICK SHAKER WAS UNUSUALLY LOUD. DIFFICULT TO HEAR OVER; HAD TO TURN RADIO VOLUMES WAY UP. COULD NOT READ AN APCH CHART ON EITHER YOKE. AUTOPLT UNUSABLE. WHEN ENGAGED; IT WENT STRAIGHT TO MCP SPD WITH THE 'A' AIRSPD WARNING AND DROVE THE ACFT NOSE DOWN. LIGHT TURB; IMC ABOVE 3000 FT; RAIN AND ICING CONDITIONS. SINCE THE STICK SHAKER WAS A NUISANCE INDICATION; WE REQUESTED A TURN-BACK FROM ATC AND DID NOT DECLARE AN EMER. FLEW LONG ENOUGH TO CHK ALL COCKPIT CIRCUIT BREAKERS AND WARNING LIGHTS. SEARCH FOR QRH GUIDANCE; COORDINATE WITH DISPATCH; INFORM FLT ATTENDANTS OF OUR RETURN; MAKE A CALMING AND APPROPRIATE PA TO PAX AND LASTLY RUN QPC LNDG DATA WAS 115500 LBS VERSUS THE 114000 LB LIMIT. I ELECTED TO LAND BECAUSE OF THE FATIGUE OF THIS SIT RATHER THAN BREAK OFF THE APCH TO BURN FUEL. (THE LNDG WAS VERY SMOOTH; MINIMUM BRAKING USED; WRITTEN UP IN LOGBOOK FOR INSPECTION.) IN HINDSIGHT; I COULD HAVE LOWERED THE LNDG GEAR EARLIER TO BURN MORE FUEL WITHOUT ADDING FLYING TIME; BUT DIDN'T THINK OF IT. IN SUMMARY; THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I'VE HAD A CONTINUOUS STICK SHAKER INFLT. ALTHOUGH NOT ALARMING; I FOUND IT UNSETTLING AND VERY FATIGUING. I CLEANED THE AIRPLANE UP ON CLBOUT KEEPING SPD WELL ABOVE MINIMUMS WONDERING IF THE NUISANCE INDICATION WOULD STOP WITH FLAPS UP; AND ANGLE OF ATTACK VANE POSSIBLY UNSTICKING; OR POSSIBLY FIGURING OUT SOME WAY TO RESET IT. ELECTING TO TURN BACK AND ACCOMPLISHING ALL COORD MENTIONED ABOVE; I DID NOT THINK ABOUT ACFT WT UNTIL THE LAST MIN. AT NIGHT IN MEDIOCRE WX; WITH A LONG RWY IN SIGHT; SLIGHTLY ABOVE WT LIMITS; AND THE STICK SHAKER VERY IRRITATING FOR THE PREVIOUS 15 MINS; I ELECTED TO LAND AND HAVE THE AIRPLANE INSPECTED FOR THAT ALONG WITH OTHER NECESSARY MAINT. IS IT POSSIBLE AND/OR PRUDENT TO SILENCE A NUISANCE STICK SHAKER INFLT? OVER THE LAST 24 HRS MANY PLTS I'VE SPOKEN WITH HAVE RAISED THIS QUESTION. I CONSIDERED AND ELECTED NOT TO TRY TO SILENCE IT IN OUR CASE BECAUSE I COULD NOT IDENT NOR RECALL ANY GUIDANCE ON THE ISSUE.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.