ACR APPROX 20 NM FROM LNDG HAS #2 ENG FAIL. PLTS MAY HAVE PERFORMED INCORRECT EMER PROC FOR ENG FAILURE. LNDG WAS UNEVENTFUL.

Narrative

ACR FLT FROM MCO TO NAS. APPROX 20 NM FROM LNDG; WHILE BEING VECTORED FOR VOR DME RWY 14 APCH; RECEIVED AURAL WARNING AND CAUTION LIGHT ALONG WITH ACFT YAW INDICATING ELECTRONIC ENG CTL (EEC) FAILURE. SECONDS LATER RECEIVED LOW OIL PRESSURE WARNING FOR #2 ENG. SCAN OF ENG INSTS INDICATED #2 ENG FAILURE WITH NO FEATHER. THE INFLT ENG FAILURE PROC REFERS TO THE ENG FIRE INFLT OR PRECAUTIONARY ENG SHUTDOWN CHKLISTS. BEING UNSURE WHAT HAD CAUSED THE ENG FAILURE; I CONSIDERED THE FIRE CHKLIST THE MORE CRITICAL PROC AND WITH THE CONCURRENCE OF THE CAPT RAN THE PROC. IN HINDSIGHT; THERE WERE NO INDICATIONS OF FIRE. THE MEMORY ITEMS WERE ACCOMPLISHED UP TO AND INCLUDING PULLING THE FIRE 'T' HANDLE. AN EMER WAS DECLARED WITH ATC. I REALIZED THE PRECAUTIONARY SHUTDOWN PROC MAY HAVE BEEN MORE APPROPRIATE AND I REVIEWED THAT CHKLIST. THE ONLY MAJOR DIFFERENCE WAS THE FIRE 'T' HANDLE. A SAFE SINGLE ENG LNDG WAS COMPLETED. IT WAS LATER DETERMINED THAT MECHANICAL FAILURE CAUSED LOSS OF THE ENG DRIVEN FUEL PUMP AND THAT CAUSED THE ENG TO QUIT. I ALLOWED MYSELF TO BECOME RUSHED AND RAN AND IMPROPER CHKLIST. NOTHING WAS DONE THAT CAUSED ADDITIONAL DAMAGE TO THE ACFT AN ALTHOUGH THE 'T' HANDLE WAS PULLED; THE EXTINGUISHING AGENT WAS INTENTIONALLY NOT DISCHARGED.