A LOCKHEED L1011 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH AN INCORRECT ENG VIBRATION TEST PANEL INSTALLED.

Date: 2002-08 · Aircraft: L-1011-500 Series · Phase: ground

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-critical|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-maintenance|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy

Synopsis

A LOCKHEED L1011 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH AN INCORRECT ENG VIBRATION TEST PANEL INSTALLED.

Narrative

THIS IS THE SIT THAT LEAD ME TO INSTALLING THE INCORRECT PART ON AN ACFT; WHICH LEAD TO AN ACFT BEING GNDED; AND A VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE BY MY COMPANY X. I AM A MEMBER OF THE R&E (RADIO AND ELECTRONICS) SHOP AT COMPANY X. I WAS OVER HELPING LINE MECHS LAUNCH AN ACFT; WHEN ANOTHER LINE MECH; LAUNCHING ANOTHER ACFT; CAME TO ME AND ASKED FOR ASSISTANCE WITH THE ENG VIBRATION INDICATORS (ALL 3) NOT TESTING PROPERLY. I WENT OVER AND BEGAN TO TROUBLESHOOT. I NARROWED IT DOWN TO WHAT I THOUGHT WAS THE TEST SWITCH ON THE FRONT OF THE PANEL IN WHICH THE INDICATORS MOUNT IN. AFTER CHKING THE SWITCH; IT WAS DETERMINED TO BE GOOD; SO WE TOOK THE ENTIRE PANEL OVER TO ANOTHER ACFT TO SEE IF IT WORKED OVER THERE. I LOOKED FOR PART NUMBERS ON THE PANEL; BUT COULDN'T FIND ANY. THEY LOOKED THE SAME (ALL THE PANEL IS; IS 4 SWITCHES AND SOME WIRING); SO I PUT IT IN. KEEP IN MIND THAT AT THIS TIME I WAS STILL TROUBLESHOOTING. I INSTALLED IT IN THE OTHER ACFT; AND IT FAILED IN THE SAME MANNER AS ON THE ORIGINAL ACFT. SO THEN; JUST TO VERIFY; WE TOOK THE KNOWN GOOD PANEL OVER TO THE DEFECTIVE ACFT AND TRIED IT THERE; IT TESTED GOOD. I TROUBLESHOT ON THE DEFECTIVE PANEL FOR A WHILE; BUT NO LUCK. BY THIS TIME THE ACFT WAS OVER 1 HR DELAYED. SO WE (MYSELF; MAINT SUPVRS; AND MAINT CTL) DECIDED THAT WE WOULD ROB THE PANEL FROM THE ACFT THAT WE WERE USING TO TROUBLESHOOT WITH. AFTER INSTALLING THE ROBBED PANEL ON THE ACFT; WE DID THE OPS CHK PER THE MAINT MANUAL; AND IT CHKED GOOD. WHILE DOING THE LOGBOOK; I HAD TO FILL OUT A SERVICEABLE PARTS TAG (KNOWN AS AN X-X0 AT COMPANY X). WHILE DOING THIS; I FOUND THERE WAS NO SPECIAL PART NUMBER USED BY COMPANY X. SO WE CALLED OUR ACFT ON GND (PRIORITY PARTS ORDER) PARTS PEOPLE AND HAD THEM CREATE ONE. DURING THIS PROCESS; WE LOOKED IN THE IPC (ILLUSTRATED PARTS CATALOG) FOR THE DEFECTIVE ACFT TO FIND A GOOD MANUFACTURER'S PART NUMBER FOR THE PANEL. WE FOUND ONE; AND THAT IS THE NUMBER WE USED. WHAT WE FAILED TO DO; IS CHK THE IPC OF THE ACFT WE ROBBED THE PART FROM TO SEE IF THE PART NUMBERS WERE THE SAME; WHICH WOULD OBVIOUSLY PROVE IF THEY WERE INTERCHANGEABLE OR NOT. I FINISHED THE LOGBOOK; AND THE ACFT DEPARTED. AT THIS TIME; MY SHIFT ENDED; AND I WENT HOME. APPARENTLY; WHEN THEY WENT TO ORDER THE NEW PANEL FOR THE ACFT; WHICH WE ROBBED THE PANEL FROM; IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE PANELS WERE DIFFERENT FOR THE 2 ACFT. I GUESS; MAINT CTL WAS CONTACTED; AND THE ACFT WAS GNDED UPON LNDG. JUST TO REITERATE; THE SYS THAT WAS FAILED INITIALLY; DID OPERATIONALLY CHK GOOD PER THE MAINT MANUAL AFTER THE INCORRECT PANEL WAS INSTALLED; AND WAS NOT SQUAWKED BY THE FLC UPON LNDG; BECAUSE IT DID FUNCTION PROPERLY INFLT.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.