THE FLC WHILE ON VECTORS FOR AN APCH DSND BELOW MSA FOR THE AREA.

Date: 2002-08 · Aircraft: Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer · Phase: approach

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-less-severe|deviation-altitude-excursion-from-assigned-altitude|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance|inflight-event-encounter-cftt-cfit|other-vhf-com-prob

Synopsis

THE FLC WHILE ON VECTORS FOR AN APCH DSND BELOW MSA FOR THE AREA.

Narrative

AN INTERMITTENTLY INOP VHF XMITTER MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO CONFUSION THAT RESULTED IN DSCNT BELOW MSA WHILE BEING RADAR VECTORED TO FINAL FOR THE VOR DME RWY 30R APCH AT SJC. I WAS THE PF IN VMC ON TOP OF SCATTERED TO BROKEN CLOUDS. BOTH OF US NOTED THE PROX TO TERRAIN; BUT BEING WELL CLR ABOVE IT; WE DID NOT IMMEDIATELY QUESTION OUR CLRNC. WE HAD JUST NOTICED THAT SOMEHOW THE ACTIVE COM HAD BEEN SWITCHED PREMATURELY TO TWR. WHETHER THAT WAS A RESULT OF SETTING OVER THE ACTIVE FREQ OR ACCEPTING ANOTHER ACFT'S FREQ; I'M NOT SURE; BUT BAY APCH FIGURED WHAT HAPPENED AND SOON SJC TWR ASKED US TO CLB TO 5000 FT. NEXT WE WERE GIVEN SEVERAL VECTORS; ONE OF WHICH WE RESPONDED TO WAS FOR AN ACFT WITH A SIMILAR CALL SIGN. THIS FACT COUPLED WITH AN INOP XMITTER MAY HAVE PREVENTED APCH CTL FROM HEARING OUR RESPONSE; THUS ELIMINATING THE FAIL SAFE FEATURE OF PRECISE READBACKS. THE APCH CONTINUED NORMALLY UNTIL WE WERE GIVEN A LOW ALT ALERT BY TWR. I HAD PREMATURELY TRANSITIONED TO VISUAL GUIDANCE AND FAILED TO MAINTAIN THE RECOMMENDED ALT AFTER ACQUIRING THE RWY. EQUIP FAILURE ASIDE; I BELIEVE COMPLACENCY PLAYED A ROLE IN THIS POORLY EXECUTED FLT. RECOGNITION OF THIS; PLUS IMPROVED CRM AND ADHERENCE TO NON PRECISION APCH PROCS; SHOULD HELP PREVENT A RECURRENCE OF THESE MISTAKES.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.