B737-300 CREW WAS INFORMED THE ACFT THAT THEY HAD FLOWN HAD LIGHTNING STRIKE DAMAGE THAT WAS DISCOVERED BY MAINT.

Date: 2002-11 · Aircraft: B737-300 · Phase: ground

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-less-severe|inflight-event-encounter-other-unknown|inflight-event-encounter-weather-turbulence

Synopsis

B737-300 CREW WAS INFORMED THE ACFT THAT THEY HAD FLOWN HAD LIGHTNING STRIKE DAMAGE THAT WAS DISCOVERED BY MAINT.

Narrative

LIGHTNING STRIKE DAMAGE ON ACFT. I WAS INFORMED BY A GND OPS AGENT IN ZZZ1 THAT THE ACFT WE HAD TERMINATED ON THE EVENING BEFORE WAS DISCOVERED TO HAVE HAD A SIGNIFICANT LIGHTNING STRIKE; RESULTING IN SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE TO VARIOUS AREAS ALONG THE TOP OF THE FUSELAGE. AT NO TIME DURING OUR FLTS DID WE ENCOUNTER ANY LIGHTNING; OR ANY CONVECTIVE WX WHATSOEVER. THE ONLY CLOUDS WE HAD WERE SOME THIN LOW STRATUS TYPES AROUND MHT. WE OBSERVED NO AVIONICS PROBS; ELECTRICAL PROBS; OR ANY OTHER ANOMALIES. DUE TO THE LOCATION OF THE STRIKE DAMAGE ALONG THE TOP OF THE ACFT FUSELAGE; IT WOULD HAVE BEEN EXTREMELY HARD TO HAVE SEEN ON A WALKAROUND; EVEN IN BROAD DAYLIGHT IN ZZZ WHERE WE TOOK OVER THE ACFT. MY BEST GUESS IS THAT THE DAMAGE MAY HAVE BEEN DONE 1 OR MORE DAYS PRIOR TO OUR FLTS. I FEEL THAT THE FO DID A VERY THOROUGH WALKAROUND IN ZZZ. I ALSO FEEL THAT MAINT PERSONNEL WOULD LIKELY BE THE ONLY ONES THAT WOULD HAVE CAUGHT IT; WHICH WAS THE CASE. I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT WE; AS A FLC; COULD HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY TO HAVE CAUGHT THE DAMAGE.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.