EMJ CAPT OBSERVES BAGGAGE LOADING DISCREPANCIES AT BGR.

Date: 2003-03 · Aircraft: Embraer Undifferentiated or Other Model · Phase: ground

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy

Synopsis

EMJ CAPT OBSERVES BAGGAGE LOADING DISCREPANCIES AT BGR.

Narrative

I NOTED LARGE OVERSIZE BAGS AND 1 CASE WITH HEAVY MARKINGS ON BAG CART ON THE WAY TO THE ACFT AT BGR. WHEN THE AGENT GAVE THE CREW THE LOAD SHEET; THERE WERE ONLY STANDARD CHKED BAGS INDICATED. I QUESTIONED THE AGENT ABOUT THE ISSUE. THE AGENT INDICATED THEY WERE ALL STANDARD BAGS. I WENT OUT TO THE CARGO HOLD; POINTED OUT A CASE WITH HEAVY MARKINGS; AND ASKED TO HAVE IT CHKED. RAMP AGENT REFUSED AND TOLD ME TO DO IT MYSELF. STATION PERSONNEL INDICATED THEY DETERMINE BAG WTS. I ASKED TO SEE STATION MANUAL ON WT AND BAL OPS; AND POINTED OUT EXAMPLE PHOTOS TO GIVE GUIDANCE TO RAMP PERSONNEL. AGENT THEN REMEMBERED THAT 1 BAG WAS 72 LBS; AND RECALCULATED THE LOAD SHEET. INCURRED A 5 MIN DELAY. I (CAPT) WAS REMOVED FROM FLT STATUS AFTER BLOCKING IN AT ZZZ. I WAS REINSTATED AND THEN REMOVED FROM FLT STATUS THE FOLLOWING DAY. I HAVE TO RPT TO VICE PRESIDENT OF FLT OPS OVER THE MATTER. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 575963: THE ORIGINAL LOAD STATED 5 CARRYON AND 29 STANDARD BAGS. REVISED LOAD SHEET INDICATED 5 CARRYON; 28 STANDARD; AND 1 AT 72 LBS. OFFLOAD AT ZZZ WAS 7 CARRYON; 24 STANDARD; AND 4 OVERSIZED BAGS. UNABLE TO HAVE BAG WITH HEAVY MARKINGS WEIGHED IN THE TIME AVAILABLE. 1 BOX OF AOG IN THE HOLD WAS NOT MARKED ON EITHER SHEET. BGR AGENTS INDICATE THEY LIFT BAGS TO DETERMINE WT CRITERIA. MANUAL INDICATED SIZE AS A FACTOR TO DETERMINE AVERAGE WTS. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATED THAT HE HAD NOTICED BAGGAGE WT DISCREPANCIES AT BGR ON PREVIOUS OCCASIONS AND; THEREFORE; WAS CHKING THE LOAD CAREFULLY. RPTR ESTIMATES THAT THE BAGGAGE LOAD ON THIS FLT COULD HAVE BEEN OFF; BUT THAT THE WT AND BAL WAS WITHIN LIMITS; AND THERE WERE NO ADVERSE FLT CHARACTERISTICS NOTED. RPTR ADVISED THAT HE IS CURRENTLY OFF OF FLT STATUS FOR MATTERS UNRELATED TO THE BAGGAGE LOADING INCIDENT; AND THAT HE IS CONSIDERING RESIGNING FROM THE COMPANY. RPTR STATED THAT THE COMPANY HAS INDICATED THAT HE COULD NOT BE FAULTED FOR QUESTIONING THE LOAD OR DELAYING THE DEP.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.