B737-800 CREW LINED UP TO LAND ON A PARALLEL TXWY INSTEAD OF THE RWY AT ATL.

Date: 2003-04 · Aircraft: B737-800

Anomalies: deviation-track-heading-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far

Synopsis

B737-800 CREW LINED UP TO LAND ON A PARALLEL TXWY INSTEAD OF THE RWY AT ATL.

Narrative

THE WX WAS VFR WITH HAZE AND THE SUN LOW ON THE HORIZON TO THE W. TFC WAS VERY LIGHT. ENTERING DOWNWIND FOR RWY 27L; WE WERE INFORMED THAT IT WOULD BE A SHORT APCH. THE FO WAS FLYING AND BRIEFED A VISUAL RWY 27L. THE DSCNT AND APCH CHKS HAD BEEN COMPLETED AND THE ILS RWY 27L IDENTED. WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH WITH A TURN OUTSIDE THE MARKER (OM). THE FO COMPLETED THE TURN TO FINAL. I NOTED A 20 KT XWIND OUT OF THE S. THE LNDG CHKS WERE COMPLETED; THE APCH WAS STABILIZED; AND I CALLED '1000 FT CLRED TO LAND.' AT 500 FT IT APPEARED TO ME THAT THE FO WAS LINING UP ON THE PARALLEL TXWY JUST S OF THE RWY. I INQUIRED IF HE WAS LOOKING AT THE RWY. HE APPEARED SURPRISED AND BANKED THE ACFT TOWARD THE RWY. I FELT THE APCH WAS NOT STABILIZED AT THAT POINT AND IMMEDIATELY SAID 'GO AROUND.' THE FO COMPLIED AND INITIATED A GAR. THE RETURN AND SUBSEQUENT LNDG WERE UNEVENTFUL. AT THE GATE AFTER THE FLT; I DEBRIEFED THE FO ON WHAT HAD HAPPENED. HE STATED: 1) HIS FLT DIRECTOR HAD NOT DISPLAYED WHAT HE HAD EXPECTED TO SEE AND HE HAD 'TARGET FIXATED' ON THE FLT DIRECTOR. 2) THE GLARE FROM THE SETTING SUN IN THE HAZE WAS A DISTR. 3) AT THE POINT I BROUGHT THE ALIGNMENT TO HIS ATTN; HE WAS NOT AWARE HE WAS ALIGNING WITH A TXWY. IN MY OPINION; CRM WAS WORKING IN OUR COCKPIT. I RECOGNIZED THE PROB; COMMUNICATED WITH THE FO; AND WE INITIATED PROPER ACTION. HOWEVER; WITH BETTER CRM THE GAR COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED. DURING OUR DEBRIEF THE FO CONFIRMED THAT; HAD HE RECOGNIZED THE FACT HE WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE DISCREPANCY BTWN THE VISUAL PICTURE AND THE INSTRUMENTATION; OUR COM WOULD HAVE BEEN ENHANCED; AND I COULD HAVE WORKED THE FLT DIRECTOR PROB AND REMOVED THE DISTR. CONTRIBUTING TO MY SENSE OF WELL BEING WERE 2 ADDITIONAL FACTORS. 1) WE FLY HUNDREDS OF VISUAL APCHS A YR TO THESE RWYS AND WE HAD THE RWY IN SIGHT FROM THE TIME WE TURNED DOWNWIND. 2) THE FO IS ONE OF OUR SENIOR; VERY COMPETENT FO'S AND MY TRUST IN HIS ABILITIES ALLOWED ME TO RELAX DURING WHAT APPEARED TO BE A ROUTINE VISUAL. LASTLY; THE FO'S 'BANK TO THE RWY' ACTION SURPRISED ME. TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING AGAIN; I WILL CHANGE MY BRIEF TO EMPHASIZE THE NEED FOR VERBAL ARTICULATION OF ANY PROB NO MATTER HOW INSIGNIFICANT IT MAY SEEM AT THE MOMENT. THE APCH COULD HAVE BEEN EASILY COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY ELECTRONIC AIDS. IN THIS CASE; THE BACKUP INFO BECAME A POINT FOR TARGET FIXATION AT A CRITICAL PHASE IN THE FLT. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 578964: WX IN ATL; CLR. LNDG W; RWY 27L. WIND; 12-16 KTS; R XWIND VISUAL; 5+ MI IN HAZE. SUN LOW ON HORIZ; MY VISION WAS SOMEWHAT REDUCED BY A SETTING SUN. AFTER BEING CLRED A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 27L; A L TURN WAS MADE ABOUT 2 MI OUTSIDE THE FAF. ABOUT 1 MI OUTSIDE THE FAF (WHILE BACKING UP THE VISUAL APCH WITH THE ILS). BOTH FLT DIRECTOR STEERING BARS WENT OUT OF VIEW. THE PITCH BARS WERE STILL OPS NORMAL. WHILE TRYING TO CORRECT THE FLT DIRECTORS; MY ATTN BEGAN TO FOCUS ON INSIDE OF THE ACFT; RATHER THAN FLYING THE VISUAL APCH. INSIDE THE FAF; I GAVE UP ON TRYING TO FIX THE FLT DIRECTORS AND FOCUSED ON FLYING THE ACFT. AT ABOUT 500 FT AGL WE RECOGNIZED THAT I; IN FACT; WAS LINED UP ON THE TXWY TO THE L OF RWY 27L INSTEAD OF THE RWY. AT THAT POINT A R TURN WAS STARTED TO REALIGN WITH RWY 27L; BUT WITH THE R XWIND AND SHORT PROX TO THE LNDG THRESHOLD; A MISSED APCH WAS EXECUTED. WE WERE VECTORED AROUND FOR ANOTHER VISUAL APCH TO RWY 27L WHICH RESULTED IN AN UNEVENTFUL LAND AND TAXI BACK TO THE GATE. IN THE APCH/LNDG SEGMENT; IF YOU DON'T NEED IT; JUST FORGET IT AND FLY THE AIRPLANE.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.