IN AN AREA OF SEVERE WX; A PLT IS UNABLE TO ACCEPT ATC OFFERED RTING CLRNC; AND IS RELUCTANT TO DECLARE AN EMER WHEN SUGGESTED BY THE ARTCC RADAR CTLR.

Date: 2003-05 · Aircraft: MU-300 Diamond 1/1A

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance|inflight-event-encounter-weather-turbulence

Synopsis

IN AN AREA OF SEVERE WX; A PLT IS UNABLE TO ACCEPT ATC OFFERED RTING CLRNC; AND IS RELUCTANT TO DECLARE AN EMER WHEN SUGGESTED BY THE ARTCC RADAR CTLR.

Narrative

AN IFR FLT PLAN WAS FILED FROM PFN TO FTY VIA PFN DIRECT LGC AND THE MIKEE4 ARR TO FTY. DUE TO SEVERE WX TO OUR W; WE ASKED FOR AND RECEIVED A CLRNC TO PARALLEL OUR RTE 10 MI TO THE E. THE CTR CTLR SUBSEQUENTLY ADVISED THAT TO CONTINUE TO LGC; WE WOULD HAVE TO TURN DUE W TO INTERCEPT THE ATL TRANSITION W OF MGM VOR; WHICH WOULD HAVE REQUIRED A PENETRATION OF THE VERY SAME WX LINE WE WERE PARALLELING; AND THERE WERE NO GAPS OR HOLES IN THE LINE. I TOLD THE CTLR I COULDN'T ACCEPT THE CLRNC ACCOUNT OF THE SEVERE WX LINE TO MY W. THE CTLR THEN REPLIED THAT WE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PROCEED DIRECT TO AMG VOR; DBN; TRBOW4 ARR. I ADVISED THE CTLR THAT IT WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE; AS THE AREA 50 MI W OF AMG WAS UNDER A TORNADO ALERT; AND THERE WAS ANOTHER LINE JUST 50 MI TO THE E OF OUR PRESENT POS WITH LEVEL 4/7 TSTMS AND HAIL WITH TOPS IN EXCESS OF 55000 FT; AND PROBABLY THE BEST I COULD DO WOULD BE PRESENT POS DIRECT DBN AND THE TROBOW ARR. THE CTLR THEN WANTED TO KNOW IF I WAS REFUSING THE CLRNC TO AMG; AND I REPLIED YES; AS I COULDN'T ACCEPT A CLRNC THAT I KNOWINGLY WOULD ENDANGER THE PEOPLE ONBOARD; AND THAT I WAS EQUIPPED WITH WX RADAR AND STORMSCOPE; AND MY INTERP OF THE INFO WAS THAT IT WAS SEVERE WX AREA; WHERE SHE WAS TRYING TO HAVE US GO. SHE THEN WANTED TO KNOW IF I WANTED TO DECLARE AN EMER; AND I SAID NO.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.