AN MD80 CAPT RPTED THAT HE AND HIS FO DID NOT RECOGNIZE THE ACFT'S STALLED ATTITUDE.
Synopsis
AN MD80 CAPT RPTED THAT HE AND HIS FO DID NOT RECOGNIZE THE ACFT'S STALLED ATTITUDE.
Narrative
PRIOR TO DEP A BAGGAGE CART HIT THE R WING. NO REAL VISIBLE DAMAGE WAS NOTICED. MAINT INSPECTED AND SIGNED THE BOOK OFF. THE FLT PLAN HAD US GOING TO FL330. WHILE AT FL330; ABOUT 1 HR INTO THE FLT; JUST PAST BCE; WE WERE DEVIATING AROUND SOME LARGE CELLS. OCCASIONAL LIGHT CHOP. SEATBELT SIGN ON. ACFT ENG AND WING ANTI-ICE ON AS WE HAD JUST COME THROUGH A CLOUD LAYER. ACFT WT 129000 LBS. THE DEVS AND CONVECTIVE ACTIVITY DID NOT SEEM TO BE ANYTHING UNUSUAL. WE STARTED TO FEEL A BUFFET AND RUMBLE. HAVING NOT FELT THAT BEFORE; AND NOT BEING CLOSE TO OUR MAX WT FOR THE ALT; THE FO AND I THOUGHT IT WAS A STRUCTURAL PROB; MAYBE A PROB WITH THE R WING. AS THE BUFFETING THE RUMBLE GOT WORSE THE ACFT WAS HAVING A HARD TIME MAINTAINING ALT AND WINGS LEVEL. THE FO KICKED OFF THE AUTOPLT AND AUTOTHROTTLES. I TOLD HER TO 'LET THE PLANE COME DOWN.' SHE LOWERED THE NOSE AND I CALLED ATC TO DECLARE AN EMER AND ASK ABOUT A SUITABLE PLACE TO LAND. AS THE PLANE WAS COMING THROUGH ABOUT FL330 I TOOK THE PLANE FROM THE FO. I ADDED SOME MORE PWR; RETRIMMED THE ACFT; AND LEVELED AT FL290. I WAS STILL HAND-FLYING THE PLANE AND IT WAS FLYING FINE. I THEN THOUGHT THE PROB WAS NOT STRUCTURAL AND THAT WE HAD APCHED A STALL. I GAVE THE PLANE BACK TO THE FO; MADE A PA; AND CALLED DISPATCH. AT NO TIME WERE THE ENGS CLOSE TO BEING OVER-BOOSTED. WE FOUND OUT LATER THAT THERE WAS MOUNTAIN WAVE ACTIVITY IN THE AREA. I THINK A COMBINATION OF MOUNTAIN WAVE; LACK OF PWR FROM ACFT ENG AND WING ANTI-ICE; AND POSSIBLE SLOW OR NO RESPONSE FROM THE AUTOTHROTTLES; CONTRIBUTED TO THIS EVENT.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.