ON DEP FROM RWY 36L AT CLT FLT CREW OF C550 PERFORM HORNET DEP PROC FOR RWY 36R INSTEAD. ATC ALERTED THEM TO THE ERROR AND PROVIDED A VECTOR CLRNC OUT OF THE AREA OF CONFLICT.
Synopsis
ON DEP FROM RWY 36L AT CLT FLT CREW OF C550 PERFORM HORNET DEP PROC FOR RWY 36R INSTEAD. ATC ALERTED THEM TO THE ERROR AND PROVIDED A VECTOR CLRNC OUT OF THE AREA OF CONFLICT.
Narrative
WE WERE CLRED FOR THE HORNET 1 DEP; HARAY TRANSITION. WE BRIEFED THE ENTIRE RTE ON THE RAMP AFTER RECEIVING THE CLRNC; AND WERE EXPECTING RWY 36R AS IT IS RIGHT NEXT TO THE FBO RAMP. WE WERE CLRED TO RWY 36L; AND AFTER SOME DISCUSSION WITH ATC ABOUT USING RWY 36R; WE WERE STILL SENT TO RWY 36L. DURING THE TAXI; AND AGAIN AT THE HOLD SHORT POINT AT THE END OF THE RWY; I REREAD THE SID INSTRUCTIONS; AT LEAST TWICE. UNFORTUNATELY; I WAS READING THE RWY 36R INSTRUCTIONS WHILE SAYING OUT LOUD RWY 36L DURING THE BRIEF. AFTER TKOF; WE FLAWLESSLY FLEW THE RWY 36R PROC; WHICH SPECIFIES A R TURN AT 2.6 DME TO 025 DEGS. ABOUT 30 SECONDS AFTER WE TURNED; ATC ASKED FOR AN IMMEDIATE L TURN TO 270 DEGS AND STATED THAT WE HAD MISSED THE SID TURN. WE MADE AN IMMEDIATE L TURN; AND I STATED TO ATC THAT WE HAD READ A 025 DEG HDG ON THE SID. HE INFORMED US THAT THE RWY 36L SID TURN WAS L TO 330 DEGS. A LITTLE WHILE LATER HE GAVE US A PHONE NUMBER TO CALL. I TALKED TO THE ATC SUPVR AFTER LNDG BY PHONE. I HAD STUDIED THE CHART REPEATEDLY ON THE FLT HOME; ALL THE TIME WONDERING HOW I HAD READ RWY 36R FOR RWY 36L. HE INFORMED US THAT LUCKILY NO ONE WAS TAKING OFF ON RWY 36R AT THE TIME AND THERE HAD BEEN NO SEPARATION PROBS; AND WAS VERY NICE ABOUT THE WHOLE THING; WHILE MAKING SURE WE UNDERSTOOD THE POSSIBLE SEVERITY OF OUR MISTAKE. I THINK THE CTLR; WHO WAS FAIRLY BUSY AT THE TIME; WAS VERY QUICK IN DETERMINING OUR MISTAKE AND ISSUING CORRECTIVE VECTORS. THIS POSSIBLY PREVENTED A MUCH MORE SERIOUS SIT. ON OUR PART; I SIMPLY MISREAD THE SID INSTRUCTIONS OFF OF THE COMMERCIAL CHART; REPEATEDLY. I DON'T KNOW IF THE EXPECTATION FOR RWY 36R PRESET ME TO READ THAT SECTION. THE ONLY RECOMMENDATION I COULD MAKE IS TO PRINT THE SEPARATE RWY SID PROCS IN MORE OF A BRIEFING FORMAT LIKE ON THE APCH CHARTS. THE WAY THE PROCS ARE WRITTEN NOW CAN LOOK JUMBLED IN A DARK COCKPIT. AT THE VERY LEAST; MAKE THE RWY NUMBERS LARGER AND ALL CAPITALS (IE; RWY 36L); AND PUT A DIVIDING LINE BTWN THE DIFFERENT RWY INSTRUCTIONS. THE WORDS 'MAINTAIN 8000 FT' ARE MORE PROMINENT THAN THE RWY NUMBERS WHICH ARE LOWER CASE AND NOT BOLDED; AND THERE IS NO SPACE BTWN THE DIFFERENT RWY INSTRUCTIONS. THIS MAKES THE ENTIRE SECTION LOOK VERY BUSY. OF COURSE; SIMPLY LOOKING AT THE PICTURE WOULD HAVE PREVENTED MY MISTAKE ANYWAY. ANOTHER PROC I AM NOW GOING TO DO; WHICH WAS SUGGESTED BY THE COPLT; IS TO HAVE BOTH PLTS READ SEPARATELY THE SID INSTRUCTIONS TO MINIMIZE THE CHANCE OF REPEATING OUR MISTAKE. THIS WOULD MOST LIKELY HAVE PREVENTED THIS INCIDENT. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 598494: THE INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN BY THE PNF WAS TO FLY RWY HEADING UNTIL REACHING THE 2.6 DME AND THEN TURN R TO A HEADING OF 025 DEGS. DURING THE TAXI WE HAD APPROX 5-6 HOLD SHORTS WITH SEVERAL SEQUENCES BTWN LARGE COMMERCIAL ACFT. JUST BEFORE REACHING THE RWY 36L HOLD SHORT POINT I REQUESTED ANOTHER BRIEFING OF THE DEP INSTRUCTIONS. AGAIN; THE PNF READ THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR RWY 36R WHILE SAYING RWY 36L.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.