CLT SUPVR REVIEWS PLTDEV WITH PA32 PLT AFTER LNDG AT DEST FOR NOT COMPLYING WITH HDG ASSIGNMENT ON DEP; CAUSING A LOSS OF SEPARATION WITH A DHC8. PLT DISPUTES INCIDENT DUE TO READBACK TO LCL AND DEP CTLR.
Synopsis
CLT SUPVR REVIEWS PLTDEV WITH PA32 PLT AFTER LNDG AT DEST FOR NOT COMPLYING WITH HDG ASSIGNMENT ON DEP; CAUSING A LOSS OF SEPARATION WITH A DHC8. PLT DISPUTES INCIDENT DUE TO READBACK TO LCL AND DEP CTLR.
Narrative
PER ATC INSTRUCTION; I TAXIED TO RWY 18L FOR AN INTXN A DEP. THE CLRNC I RECALL RECEIVING FROM TWR; WAS 'NXXX; HDG 155 DEGS; CLRED FOR TKOF RWY 18L INTXN A; ACR TFC HOLDING IN POS FULL LENGTH.' I DEPARTED AND ONCE REACHING A SAFE ALT; I BEGAN MY TURN TO 155 DEGS. BEFORE MAKING MY INITIAL TURN; I HEARD TWR ADVISE THE ACR TFC THAT I WAS IN A L TURN AND THEY WERE CLRED FOR TKOF. I HAD NOT BEGUN MY TURN YET; WHEN TWR MADE THAT XMISSION. I BEGAN TO MAKE MY TURN. TWR ADVISED ME TO SWITCH TO DEP. WHEN I CONTACTED DEP I SAID; 'NXXX; PASSING 1200 FT TURNING TO 155 DEGS ATC ASSIGNED.' AFTER MY INITIAL CALL TO DEP; THE CTLR DID NOT ADVISE THAT THEY WANTED ME ON ANOTHER HDG OTHER THAN 155 DEGS. THE ONLY OTHER INSTRUCTIONS I RECEIVED WERE TO CLB TO 5000 FT AND ALSO TO TURN TO 090 DEGS. THIS DID NOT OCCUR IMMEDIATELY AFTER MY INITIAL CALL TO ATC. I BELIEVE THAT AT LEAST A MIN PASSED BEFORE RECEIVING THE NEW HDG. I WAS LATER INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT THE CHARLOTTE ATC SUPVR BY SEYMOUR JOHNSON APCH (GSB). GSB ACTUALLY CONTACTED ME ON MY DEST UNICOM FREQ AFTER I HAD CANCELLED IFR. THE CLT SUPVR ADVISED THAT THE HDG THAT WAS ISSUED TO ME WAS ACTUALLY 115 DEGS; NOT 155 DEGS. ATC LOST IFR SEPARATION WITH MY ACFT AND THE ACR TFC THAT DEPARTED BEHIND ME. I DO NOT RECALL RECEIVING AN INSTRUCTION FOR 115 DEGS. I FEEL THIS COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED BY NOT CLRING ME FOR TKOF IN FRONT OF A TWIN TURBINE ACFT WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAS A HIGHER SPD AND CLB RATE THAN A PA32 CHEROKEE SIX. SINCE THIS DID NOT HAPPEN; ATC HAD A CHANCE TO CORRECT MY HDG WHEN I CHKED IN WITH DEP AND ADVISED THAT I WAS TURNING TO 155 DEGS; ATC ASSIGNED. THE CONDITIONS AT THE TIME WERE VMC AND THE ACR TFC MAY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION AND I ASSUME THEY HAD INFO FROM THEIR TCASII.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.