CFI RATED PLT OF C172 IS FRUSTRATED WITH CONFUSING CLRNCS AND INSTRUCTIONS FROM LGB TWR.
Synopsis
CFI RATED PLT OF C172 IS FRUSTRATED WITH CONFUSING CLRNCS AND INSTRUCTIONS FROM LGB TWR.
Narrative
2 MINOR PROBS; NO VIOLATION; NO NEAR MISS; NO RWY INCURSION. TAXI DIFFICULTIES AND LGB ARE ONE THING IN THE SAME; KNOWING THIS I HAD THE RWY DIAGRAM ON YOKE. TAXI FROM THE FBO TO RWY 25L AT TXWY D INTXN FOR TKOF. PLATE WAS REVIEWED. SIMPLE EXCEPT PROGRESSIVE INSTRUCTIONS WERE REQUIRED DUE TO TXWY D AT RWY 25L NOT MARKED. IF YOU LOOK AT THE PLATE TXWY D AND RWY 34R AT THE E END OF TXWY F; THE EXPANSE OF PAVEMENT HERE IS UNMARKED; WITH SUCH CLOSE PROX TO RWY 30 IT IS A BUSY PLACE. IS IT POSSIBLE TO MARK THIS MORE CLRLY? NEXT TIME I'LL KNOW; BUT I COULDN'T HAVE BEEN BETTER PREPARED. CLRNC DELIVERY INSTRUCTED ME TO DEPART RWY 25L AT TXWY D; DEPART E TO THE HIGHWAY 91/605 INTERCHANGE AT OR BELOW 2500 FT MSL. THE PROB IS IF I TURN DOWNWIND ON RWY 25L TO THE E AS INSTRUCTED I WILL NOT END UP AT THE 91/605 INTERCHANGE DUE TO THIS CONFUSION I REQUESTED TKOF CLRNC L DOWNWIND DEP WHICH WOULD HAVE SENT ME E AS INSTRUCTED. ONCE AIRBORNE I WAS FIRST INSTRUCTED TO DO A L 270 DEGS; THEN A R TURN TO A HDG OF NE WHICH DID PUT ME OVER THE 91/605. THE PROB IS THAT I WOULD HAVE PREFERRED MORE SPECIFIC INSTRUCTION FROM CLRNC DELIVERY. I NORMALLY FLY IFR TO AVOID THESE PROBS YET ON A PRISTINE SUMMER NIGHT I THOUGHT THIS UNNECESSARY. MAYBE FROM FLYING IFR SO MUCH I EXPECT SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS. I AM A CFI AND CAN'T IMAGINE HOW A LOW TIME PLT MIGHT HANDLE THIS SIT. I CAN FLY THE AIRPLANE ANY WAY THEY WANT; BUT I NEED TO KNOW.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.